Keyword summary
0% 3 analyzed articles/videos 742 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Chick Fil A results contain 31 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization , Indoctrination , and Framing Effect , with Anecdotal as the most egregious example at 14.4% saturation with 428 hits . Analysis detected 2,577 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,968 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.8% and a BS Rank of 48% (17,992 of 34,418 keywords). This Chick Fil A is better (less manipulative) than 52.30% of the peer group. Chick Fil A
Keyword details
Total words: 2,968
Article count: 3
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
48% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 47.7% percentile 2.8% BS Score3 analyzed articles3K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 6.8% 6.8% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 4.0% 4.0% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 3.4% 3.4% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Keyword 14.4% 14.4% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 1.0% 1.0% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Keyword 7.3% 7.3% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 4.4% 4.4% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 0.9% 0.9% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 0.1% 0.1% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 1.8% 1.8% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 6.8%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 4.0%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 15.9% Anecdotal: Keyword 14.4%, sitewide 5.2% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 4.4%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 8.7%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 7.5% Indoctrination: Keyword 7.3%, sitewide 0.0% In-Group Bias: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 3.7%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 5.3% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 4.1%, sitewide 4.0% Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 4.0%, sitewide 0.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 3.7% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 0.5% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 2.2% Begging the Question: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 1.7% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst