Keyword summary
â 44% 1 analyzed article/video 740 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Chicago Theater results contain 25 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization , Appeal to Authority , and Framing Effect , with Halo Effect as the most egregious example at 11.8% saturation with 349 hits . Analysis detected 2,170 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,960 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.9% and a BS Rank of â 52% (18,258 of 37,536 keywords). This Chicago Theater is worse (more manipulative) than 51.40% of the peer group. Chicago Theater
Keyword details
Total words: 2,960
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
51% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 51.4% percentile 2.9% BS Score1 analyzed articles3K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0â50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 5.5% 5.5% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 1.2% 1.2% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 4.2% 4.2% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 1.1% 1.1% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 2.3% 2.3% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 6.0% 6.0% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 11.8% 11.8% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 4.8% 4.8% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Keyword 0.9% 0.9% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Keyword 1.9% 1.9% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 5.5%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 4.2%, sitewide 15.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 11.8%, sitewide 6.7% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 6.0%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 4.8%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 7.5%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 6.9% Optimism Bias: Keyword 4.1%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 4.6% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 3.3% Recency Bias: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 2.7% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 2.7% Indoctrination: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 0.0% Bandwagon: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 2.2% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 1.9% Begging the Question: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 1.7% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 0.8% Composition/Division: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 0.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst