Keyword summary
⁠76%1 analyzed article/video1,455 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Chicago Symphony Orchestra results contain 34 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority, Optimism Bias, and Framing Effect, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 17% saturation with 742 hits. Analysis detected 4,281 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,365 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.9% and a BS Rank of ⁠51% (18,641 of 37,536 keywords). This Chicago Symphony Orchestra is worse (more manipulative) than 50.30% of the peer group.
Chicago Symphony Orchestra
Keyword ranking list
Keyword details
Total words: 4,365
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

50% percentile
025507510050.3% percentile
2.9% BS Score1 analyzed articles4.4K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 5.5%5.5%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 4.6%4.6%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 1.9%1.9%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 3.5%3.5%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 1.8%1.8%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 6.8%6.8%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Keyword 4.4%4.4%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 4.6%4.6%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 1.9%1.9%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 4.3%4.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 5.5%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 17.0%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 4.6%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 6.8%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 4.6%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Keyword 4.3%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Keyword 5.7%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Keyword 4.1%, sitewide 5.2%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 4.7%, sitewide 3.3%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 4.4%, sitewide 0.8%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 3.7%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 3.1%Genetic Fallacy: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 1.4%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.5%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 1.9%Bandwagon: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos