Keyword summary
4% 1 analyzed article/video 1,078 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Chicago River results contain 19 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Framing Effect , and Availability Heuristic , with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 14.6% saturation with 472 hits . Analysis detected 1,427 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,234 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.3% and a BS Rank of 36% (24,251 of 37,536 keywords). This Chicago River is better (less manipulative) than 64.60% of the peer group. Chicago River
Keyword details
Total words: 3,234
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
35% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 35.4% percentile 2.3% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.2K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 4.3% 4.3% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 4.6% 4.6% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 1.3% 1.3% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 1.0% 1.0% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 1.5% 1.5% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 0.9% 0.9% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 3.8% 3.8% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 1.7% 1.7% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 1.4% 1.4% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Keyword 0.7% 0.7% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 4.3%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 4.6%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 14.6%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 3.8%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 4.6% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 3.3% False Dilemma: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 1.5% Hindsight Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 1.4% Indoctrination: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 0.0% Unattributed Quote: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 1.1% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 0.8% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst