Keyword summary
92% 2 analyzed articles/videos 791 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Chicago Blackhawks results contain 29 faulty reasoning types, including Halo Effect , Framing Effect , and Appeal to Emotion , with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 17% saturation with 717 hits . Analysis detected 4,449 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,215 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.6% and a BS Rank of 66% (12,990 of 37,536 keywords). This Chicago Blackhawks is worse (more manipulative) than 65.40% of the peer group. Chicago Blackhawks
Keyword details
Total words: 4,215
Article count: 2
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
65% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 65.4% percentile 3.6% BS Score2 analyzed articles4.2K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 11.3% 11.3% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 4.5% 4.5% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 17.0% 17.0% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 1.9% 1.9% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 8.7% 8.7% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 2.3% 2.3% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 12.2% 12.2% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 2.5% 2.5% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 2.2% 2.2% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 5.6% 5.6% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 11.3%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 4.5%, sitewide 19.2% Optimism Bias: Keyword 17.0%, sitewide 6.0% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 8.7%, sitewide 15.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 12.2%, sitewide 6.7% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 5.6%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 7.5% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 7.5%, sitewide 5.3% In-Group Bias: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 6.9% Anecdotal: Keyword 4.5%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 4.6% Unattributed Quote: Keyword 4.4%, sitewide 1.1% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 3.7% Bandwagon: Keyword 3.6%, sitewide 2.2% Recency Bias: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 2.7% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 0.5% Loss Aversion: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 2.5% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 1.9% False Dilemma: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 1.5% Hindsight Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 1.4% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst