Keyword summary
0%5 analyzed articles/videos3,810 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Chi Osse results contain 40 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Framing Effect, and Hasty Generalization, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 9.9% saturation with 1,838 hits. Analysis detected 13,714 faulty-reasoning hits from 18,544 analyzed words across 5 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.8% and a BS Rank of 19% (29,736 of 36,716 keywords). This Chi Osse is better (less manipulative) than 81.00% of the peer group.
Chi Osse
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Texas Supreme Court1%
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
0%Javian Hawkins1%
0%Atlanta Falcons1%
19%Chi Osse (selected)2%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 18,544
Article count: 5
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

19% percentile
025507510019.0% percentile
1.8% BS Score5 analyzed articles18.5K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 6.5%6.5%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 6.8%6.8%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 4.7%4.7%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 1.3%1.3%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 2.6%2.6%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 1.6%1.6%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 2.4%2.4%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Keyword 0.5%0.5%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 2.1%2.1%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 9.9%9.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 6.5%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 6.8%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 4.7%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 11.1%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 9.9%, sitewide 5.3%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 5.4%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 2.2%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 2.0%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 1.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate