Keyword summary
78% 3 analyzed articles/videos 3,575 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Chemical Industry results contain 49 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Framing Effect , and Biased Writer Voice , with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 13.5% saturation with 1,614 hits . Analysis detected 14,228 faulty-reasoning hits from 11,937 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.4% and a BS Rank of 39% (23,051 of 37,536 keywords). This Chemical Industry is better (less manipulative) than 61.40% of the peer group. Chemical Industry
Keyword details
Total words: 11,937
Article count: 3
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
39% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 38.6% percentile 2.4% BS Score3 analyzed articles11.9K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Keyword SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 8.5% 8.5% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 9.7% 9.7% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 1.0% 1.0% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 6.4% 6.4% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 5.1% 5.1% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 2.5% 2.5% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Keyword 1.4% 1.4% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Keyword 3.1% 3.1% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 3.8% 3.8% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 13.5% 13.5% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 8.5%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 9.7%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 13.5%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 6.4%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 5.1%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 5.7%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 6.5%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 3.8%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 6.7% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 6.7%, sitewide 5.3% Optimism Bias: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 4.0% Bandwagon: Keyword 3.7%, sitewide 2.2% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 3.7% Loss Aversion: Keyword 3.6%, sitewide 2.5% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 3.3% Indoctrination: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 0.0% False Dilemma: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 1.5% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 2.7% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 2.0% Unattributed Quote: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 1.1% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst