Keyword summary
95% 1 analyzed article/video 326 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Charles Leclerc results contain 24 faulty reasoning types, including Halo Effect , Fundamental Attribution Error , and Framing Effect , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 45.5% saturation with 445 hits . Analysis detected 1,301 faulty-reasoning hits from 978 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 5.5% and a BS Rank of 84% (6,088 of 37,536 keywords). This Charles Leclerc is worse (more manipulative) than 83.80% of the peer group. Charles Leclerc
Keyword details
Total words: 978
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
84% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 83.8% percentile 5.5% BS Score1 analyzed articles978 analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 45.5% 45.5% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 7.3% 7.3% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 4.2% 4.2% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 3.2% 3.2% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Keyword 6.1% 6.1% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 2.7% 2.7% Fundamental Attribution E… Sitewide 2.7% Keyword 7.5% 7.5% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 4.4% 4.4% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Keyword 0.3% 0.3% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 4.7% 4.7% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 45.5%, sitewide 5.3% Framing Effect: Keyword 7.3%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 4.2%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 15.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 9.3%, sitewide 6.7% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 4.4%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 4.7%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 7.5% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 7.5%, sitewide 2.7% Indoctrination: Keyword 6.1%, sitewide 0.0% Optimism Bias: Keyword 3.7%, sitewide 6.0% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 5.3%, sitewide 2.2% Anecdotal: Keyword 4.9%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 4.6% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 4.4%, sitewide 1.9% False Dilemma: Keyword 3.7%, sitewide 1.5% Unattributed Quote: Keyword 3.7%, sitewide 1.1% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 3.3% Actor-Observer Bias: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 0.6% No True Scotsman: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 0.1% Bandwagon: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 2.2% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 1.9% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 0.8% Red Herring: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 0.7% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst