Keyword summary
â 0% 1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Charles Hodgson results contain 26 faulty reasoning types, including Availability Heuristic , Post Hoc (False Cause) , and Biased Writer Voice , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 8.1% saturation with 409 hits . Analysis detected 2,702 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,055 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of â 0% (0 of 35,112 keywords). This Charles Hodgson is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group. Charles Hodgson
Keyword details
Total words: 5,055
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
0% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 0.0% percentile 0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles5.1K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Keyword SitewideShared scale 0â50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 0.5% 0.5% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 2.4% 2.4% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 8.1% 8.1% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 2.5% 2.5% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 0.2% 0.2% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 0.6% 0.6% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 0.7% 0.7% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 2.6% 2.6% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Keyword 1.0% 1.0% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Keyword 0.4% 0.4% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 8.1%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 5.8%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 6.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 5.5%, sitewide 3.3% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 5.1%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 5.2% Unattributed Quote: Keyword 4.9%, sitewide 1.1% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 4.0% Hindsight Bias: Keyword 3.8%, sitewide 1.4% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 2.7% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 2.0% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 1.9% Begging the Question: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 1.7% False Dilemma: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 1.5% Actor-Observer Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 0.6% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst