Keyword summary
0%1 analyzed article/video599 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Charles Adair results contain 22 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Framing Effect, and Begging the Question, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 16.6% saturation with 298 hits. Analysis detected 1,581 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,797 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 4% and a BS Rank of 71% (11,027 of 37,536 keywords). This Charles Adair is worse (more manipulative) than 70.60% of the peer group.
Charles Adair
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Lieutenant Governor1%
0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
0%Texas Supreme Court1%
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
71%Charles Adair (selected)4%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 1,797
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

71% percentile
025507510070.6% percentile
4.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.8K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 10.9%10.9%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 1.6%1.6%Begging the QuestionSitewide 1.7%Keyword 9.0%9.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 4.1%4.1%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 1.3%1.3%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 14.0%14.0%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Keyword 4.7%4.7%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Keyword 1.2%1.2%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Keyword 2.3%2.3%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 2.8%2.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 10.9%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 14.0%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 16.6%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 4.1%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 9.1%Begging the Question: Keyword 9.0%, sitewide 1.7%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 5.9%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 6.7%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 5.2%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 4.7%, sitewide 0.8%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 4.6%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 3.7%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 2.2%Recency Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 2.5%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 1.9%Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 0.0%False Dilemma: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 1.5%Unattributed Quote: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 1.1%Primacy Effect: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 0.9%Indoctrination: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 0.0%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos