Family of Charles Adair, man killed in Wyandotte County jail, says bodycam footage was 'devastating' 62%

By Jodi Fortino22%

5/7/2026, 9:00:00 AM

BS Summary: This article contains 20 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Begging the Question, and Framing Effect, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 31.1% saturation with 186 hits. Analysis detected 1,082 faulty-reasoning hits from 599 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 57.3% and a BS Rank of 62% (8,415 of 21,886 articles). This article is worse (more manipulative) than 61.60% of the article peer group.

Nearly a year after a 50-year-old Kansas City, Kansas, man was killed in the Wyandotte County jail, his family has viewed body camera footage showing the moments leading up to his death. 
Charles Adair died on July 5, 2025, after a sheriff’s deputy knelt on his back for one minute and 26 seconds, according to police documents. 
The county coroner ruled the death a homicide by mechanical asphyxiation. 
Erica Adair, the victim’s sister, called the bodycam footage “devastating” as she stood in front of the Wyandotte County courthouse on Wednesday with her mother and other family members. 
The family has previously called for law enforcement to publicly release the footage. 
“We basically watched our loved one die. 
They knelt on his back until he was breathless,” Erica Adair said. 
“(It was) pretty devastating to watch, although it was something that we needed to see.” 
A spokesperson for the Wyandotte County sheriff’s office said it worked with the legal department to follow applicable laws for requests to view video by family as soon as it received the request to see the footage. 
“The first time we received any request from the family or their attorneys to view the video was April 16, 2026,” the spokesperson said. 
“After receiving that request, we worked to coordinate a place and time for them to view the video and that occurred today.” 
The sheriff’s office had no further comment. 
The family has filed a federal wrongful death lawsuit against Sheriff Daniel Soptic for showing “deliberate indifference” in failing to train his deputies. 
The lawsuit also names the Unified Government of Wyandotte County and Kansas City, Kansas, claiming Adair’s constitutional rights were ignored. 
Richard Fatherley, the deputy charged with second-degree murder in Adair’s death, and five other deputies are included in the suit. 
The other five deputies said they hadn’t received proper training on use-of-force situations during the past three to five years, according to the lawsuit. 
Fatherley’s preliminary hearing is set for May 20. 
Ted Ruzicka, a lawyer representing the family with Davis, Bethune & Jones, said Adair was handcuffed, face down and compliant when the deputy knelt on his back and cut off his ability to breathe. 
He was in jail on misdemeanor traffic warrants. 
“A traffic violation shouldn't be a death sentence,” Ruzicka said. 
“The Adair family is here seeking accountability so that no other family has to suffer as they're suffering.” 
Civil rights attorneys Harry Daniels and Ben Crump are also representing the family. 
Daniels said on Wednesday that it was his second time seeing the video and it was still hard to watch. 
He said Adair needed medical attention and sought it when officers surrounded him and one used “unnecessary, excessive force.” 
The lawsuit alleges that Adair was diagnosed as a schizophrenic, was suffering a mental breakdown and had a serious infection of his left leg. 
Deputies were returning Adair to his cell from the infirmary when deputies placed him on a lower bunk in a cell, with his upper body on the bed and his knees on the floor, the lawsuit says. 
Adair was placed face down in what’s considered an unauthorized prone restraint position, the suit says. 
He was handcuffed and in a wheelchair while complying with commands, according to the suit. 
“The family know now exactly what happened to him, and what happened to him was a murder that took place,” Daniels said. 
“It was an unlawful, excessive use-of-force killing of Charles Adair  something that we have echoed from the beginning.” 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 14.5%Jodi Fortino: 1.0%Columbia Missourian: 1.7%Confirmation Bias14.5%This article: 0.0%Jodi Fortino: 0.4%Columbia Missourian: 0.8%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 4.8%Jodi Fortino: 1.8%Columbia Missourian: 2.7%Availability Heuristic4.8%This article: 1.3%Jodi Fortino: 0.7%Columbia Missourian: 0.9%Representativeness Heuristic1.3%This article: 0.0%Jodi Fortino: 0.1%Columbia Missourian: 0.4%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 3.7%Jodi Fortino: 0.9%Columbia Missourian: 1.3%Overconfidence Bias3.7%This article: 15.5%Jodi Fortino: 3.9%Columbia Missourian: 5.5%Framing Effect15.5%This article: 3.0%Jodi Fortino: 1.0%Columbia Missourian: 1.0%Loss Aversion3.0%This article: 8.3%Jodi Fortino: 0.5%Columbia Missourian: 0.7%Status Quo Bias8.3%This article: 0.0%Jodi Fortino: 0.3%Columbia Missourian: 0.3%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Jodi Fortino: 7.3%Columbia Missourian: 4.5%Optimism Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Jodi Fortino: 1.0%Columbia Missourian: 1.6%Pessimism Bias0.0%This article: 22.2%Jodi Fortino: 3.2%Columbia Missourian: 5.4%Negativity Bias22.2%This article: 0.0%Jodi Fortino: 1.7%Columbia Missourian: 1.7%Self-Serving Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Jodi Fortino: 0.6%Columbia Missourian: 0.6%Fundamental Attribution Error0.0%This article: 0.0%Jodi Fortino: 0.1%Columbia Missourian: 0.2%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Jodi Fortino: 2.7%Columbia Missourian: 1.6%In-Group Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Jodi Fortino: 0.1%Columbia Missourian: 0.4%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Jodi Fortino: 2.2%Columbia Missourian: 2.4%Halo Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Jodi Fortino: 0.0%Columbia Missourian: 0.0%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Jodi Fortino: 0.0%Columbia Missourian: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 3.3%Jodi Fortino: 0.7%Columbia Missourian: 0.9%Recency Bias3.3%This article: 3.2%Jodi Fortino: 0.3%Columbia Missourian: 0.3%Primacy Effect3.2%This article: 0.0%Jodi Fortino: 0.0%Columbia Missourian: 0.0%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Jodi Fortino: 0.1%Columbia Missourian: 0.5%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%Jodi Fortino: 0.2%Columbia Missourian: 0.2%Straw Man0.0%This article: 10.2%Jodi Fortino: 2.0%Columbia Missourian: 2.9%Appeal to Authority10.2%This article: 1.7%Jodi Fortino: 0.8%Columbia Missourian: 1.1%False Dilemma1.7%This article: 0.0%Jodi Fortino: 0.3%Columbia Missourian: 1.0%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%Jodi Fortino: 0.2%Columbia Missourian: 0.1%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 0.0%Jodi Fortino: 3.4%Columbia Missourian: 3.6%Hasty Generalization0.0%This article: 0.0%Jodi Fortino: 0.0%Columbia Missourian: 0.2%Red Herring0.0%This article: 0.0%Jodi Fortino: 1.1%Columbia Missourian: 0.7%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 31.1%Jodi Fortino: 6.1%Columbia Missourian: 5.2%Appeal to Emotion31.1%This article: 20.0%Jodi Fortino: 0.7%Columbia Missourian: 0.6%Begging the Question20.0%This article: 0.0%Jodi Fortino: 2.6%Columbia Missourian: 2.0%Post Hoc (False Cause)0.0%This article: 0.0%Jodi Fortino: 0.0%Columbia Missourian: 0.0%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 0.0%Jodi Fortino: 0.2%Columbia Missourian: 0.4%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 0.0%Jodi Fortino: 0.1%Columbia Missourian: 0.2%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%Jodi Fortino: 0.2%Columbia Missourian: 0.2%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 7.0%Jodi Fortino: 2.9%Columbia Missourian: 2.6%Anecdotal7.0%This article: 0.0%Jodi Fortino: 0.1%Columbia Missourian: 0.1%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 14.0%Jodi Fortino: 1.0%Columbia Missourian: 1.3%Ambiguity (Equivocation)14.0%This article: 0.0%Jodi Fortino: 0.0%Columbia Missourian: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Jodi Fortino: 0.0%Columbia Missourian: 0.1%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Jodi Fortino: 0.0%Columbia Missourian: 0.1%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Jodi Fortino: 0.0%Columbia Missourian: 0.1%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Jodi Fortino: 0.0%Columbia Missourian: 0.1%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 4.0%Jodi Fortino: 0.6%Columbia Missourian: 0.8%Unattributed Quote4.0%This article: 1.2%Jodi Fortino: 0.5%Columbia Missourian: 0.7%Quote-first Misdirection1.2%This article: 8.5%Jodi Fortino: 1.1%Columbia Missourian: 2.9%Biased Writer Voice8.5%This article: 3.0%Jodi Fortino: 2.2%Columbia Missourian: 1.3%Indoctrination3.0%This article: 0.0%Jodi Fortino: 0.4%Columbia Missourian: 0.7%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Jodi Fortino: 0.0%Columbia Missourian: 0.2%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Jodi Fortino: 1.0%Columbia Missourian: 1.7%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…0.0%

599 words analyzed.

Speakers

4speakers49%attributed speech304writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 15 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 32 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 25 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 11 words • 0.0% coverageErica Adair • 29 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 13 words • 0.0% coverageErica Adair • 7 words • 100.0% coverageErica Adair • 12 words • 0.0% coverageErica Adair • 15 words • 0.0% coverageWyandotte County sheriff’s office • 37 words • 0.0% coverageWyandotte County sheriff’s office • 24 words • 0.0% coverageWyandotte County sheriff’s office • 22 words • 0.0% coverageWyandotte County sheriff’s office • 7 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 23 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 20 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 20 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 24 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 8 words • 0.0% coverageTed Ruzicka • 34 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 8 words • 0.0% coverageTed Ruzicka • 10 words • 0.0% coverageTed Ruzicka • 18 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 13 words • 0.0% coverageHarry Daniels • 20 words • 0.0% coverageHarry Daniels • 19 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 24 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 37 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 16 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 15 words • 0.0% coverageHarry Daniels • 22 words • 100.0% coverageHarry Daniels • 19 words • 0.0% coverage
Selected voice

Harry Daniels

100%flagged-word coverage
80 attributed words27% of attributed speech54% writer coverage
0%15.0%30.0%Biased Writer Voice+27.5 ptsWriter: 0.0%Harry Daniels: 27.5%27.5%Unattributed Quote-7.9 ptsWriter: 7.9%Harry Daniels: 0.0%0.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.