Keyword summary
0%1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Charities And Ngos results contain 38 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization, Politically Right Leaning Bias, and Negativity Bias, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 68.7% saturation with 1,678 hits. Analysis detected 6,818 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,442 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of 0% (0 of 35,712 keywords). This Charities And Ngos is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
Charities And Ngos
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
0%Javian Hawkins1%
0%Atlanta Falcons1%
0%Anthony Romano1%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
0%Charities And Ngos (selected)0%
Keyword details
Total words: 2,442
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

0% percentile
02550751000.0% percentile
0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.4K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 68.7%68.7%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 35.7%35.7%Politically Right Leaning…Sitewide 1.4%Keyword 28.5%28.5%Straw ManSitewide 0.9%Keyword 14.6%14.6%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 14.5%14.5%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 2.1%2.1%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 10.4%10.4%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 4.0%4.0%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Keyword 5.0%5.0%Ad HominemSitewide 2.2%Keyword 6.7%6.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 68.7%, sitewide 5.3%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 35.7%, sitewide 8.1%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Keyword 28.5%, sitewide 1.4%Framing Effect: Keyword 14.5%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 19.4%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 10.4%, sitewide 15.9%Straw Man: Keyword 14.6%, sitewide 0.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 11.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 9.1%, sitewide 7.5%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 4.0%, sitewide 9.1%In-Group Bias: Keyword 8.9%, sitewide 6.9%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 6.8%, sitewide 3.1%Ad Hominem: Keyword 6.7%, sitewide 2.2%Optimism Bias: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 5.2%Indoctrination: Keyword 5.0%, sitewide 0.0%Horn Effect: Keyword 4.6%, sitewide 1.0%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 4.6%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 4.1%, sitewide 1.9%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 4.0%, sitewide 3.3%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 2.2%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 2.5%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos