Keyword summary
0%1 analyzed article/video865 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Chang Liu results contain 22 faulty reasoning types, including Post Hoc (False Cause), Burden of Proof, and Negativity Bias, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 8.4% saturation with 291 hits. Analysis detected 1,788 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,460 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.3% and a BS Rank of 37% (23,941 of 37,536 keywords). This Chang Liu is better (less manipulative) than 63.80% of the peer group.
Chang Liu
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Lieutenant Governor1%
0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
0%Texas Supreme Court1%
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
37%Chang Liu (selected)3%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 3,460
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

36% percentile
025507510036.2% percentile
2.3% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.5K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 8.4%8.4%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 4.1%4.1%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 3.4%3.4%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 2.3%2.3%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 0.9%0.9%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 2.8%2.8%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Keyword 0.3%0.3%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 2.7%2.7%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 2.0%2.0%Burden of ProofSitewide 0.4%Keyword 5.0%5.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 8.4%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 4.1%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 5.3%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 5.0%, sitewide 3.3%Burden of Proof: Keyword 5.0%, sitewide 0.4%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 3.7%Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 0.0%Recency Bias: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 2.7%Unattributed Quote: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 1.1%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 1.9%Begging the Question: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 1.7%Hindsight Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 1.4%Actor-Observer Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 0.6%Primacy Effect: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 0.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos