Keyword summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 1,056 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Chanel results contain 30 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice , Optimism Bias , and Halo Effect , with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 11% saturation with 465 hits . Analysis detected 3,644 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,224 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.9% and a BS Rank of 51% (18,743 of 37,536 keywords). This Chanel is worse (more manipulative) than 50.10% of the peer group. Chanel
Keyword details
Total words: 4,224
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
50% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 50.1% percentile 2.9% BS Score1 analyzed articles4.2K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Keyword SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 3.6% 3.6% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 3.6% 3.6% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 1.4% 1.4% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 1.4% 1.4% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 2.0% 2.0% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 0.4% 0.4% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 11.0% 11.0% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 3.7% 3.7% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Keyword 1.0% 1.0% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Keyword 2.2% 2.2% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 3.6%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 3.6%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 11.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 11.0%, sitewide 8.1% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 11.0%, sitewide 5.3% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 9.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 3.7%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 6.9% Optimism Bias: Keyword 6.8%, sitewide 6.0% Halo Effect: Keyword 6.3%, sitewide 6.7% Anecdotal: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 5.2% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 5.2%, sitewide 4.0% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 4.6% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 4.4%, sitewide 3.3% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 4.1%, sitewide 1.9% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 3.7% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 2.7% Hindsight Bias: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 1.4% Unattributed Quote: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 1.1% Bandwagon: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 1.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst