Keyword summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 463 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Chamel Abdulkarim results contain 26 faulty reasoning types, including Fundamental Attribution Error , Biased Writer Voice , and Framing Effect , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 18.8% saturation with 261 hits . Analysis detected 1,775 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,389 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 4.9% and a BS Rank of 80% (7,419 of 35,590 keywords). This Chamel Abdulkarim is worse (more manipulative) than 79.20% of the peer group. Chamel Abdulkarim
Keyword details
Total words: 1,389
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
79% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 79.2% percentile 4.9% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.4K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 8.1% 8.1% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 7.3% 7.3% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 1.4% 1.4% Fundamental Attribution E… Sitewide 2.7% Keyword 10.2% 10.2% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 3.9% 3.9% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Keyword 7.0% 7.0% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 9.7% 9.7% Politically Right Leaning… Sitewide 1.4% Keyword 5.5% 5.5% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 3.8% 3.8% Unattributed Quote Sitewide 1.1% Keyword 4.6% 4.6% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 8.1%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 18.8%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 7.3%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 3.9%, sitewide 11.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 10.2%, sitewide 2.7% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 9.7%, sitewide 5.3% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 5.3%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 3.8%, sitewide 7.5% Indoctrination: Keyword 7.0%, sitewide 0.0% In-Group Bias: Keyword 6.2%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 6.7% Politically Right Leaning Bias: Keyword 5.5%, sitewide 1.4% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 4.7%, sitewide 4.6% Unattributed Quote: Keyword 4.6%, sitewide 1.1% False Dilemma: Keyword 3.9%, sitewide 1.5% Ad Hominem: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 2.2% Begging the Question: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 1.7% Personal Incredulity: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 0.2% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 2.0% Straw Man: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 0.9% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 2.2% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 0.8% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 1.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst