Keyword summary
0%2 analyzed articles/videos1,429 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Chain Restaurants results contain 32 faulty reasoning types, including Availability Heuristic, Appeal to Emotion, and Status Quo Bias, with Anecdotal as the most egregious example at 41% saturation with 1,756 hits. Analysis detected 8,783 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,287 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 6.4% and a BS Rank of 88% (4,616 of 37,536 keywords). This Chain Restaurants is worse (more manipulative) than 87.70% of the peer group.
Chain Restaurants
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Lieutenant Governor1%
0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
0%Texas Supreme Court1%
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
88%Chain Restaurants (selected)7%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 4,287
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

88% percentile
025507510087.7% percentile
6.4% BS Score2 analyzed articles4.3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Keyword 41.0%41.0%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 29.0%29.0%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 11.1%11.1%Status Quo BiasSitewide 2.2%Keyword 15.4%15.4%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 6.3%6.3%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 28.5%28.5%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 2.0%2.0%Primacy EffectSitewide 0.9%Keyword 5.5%5.5%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Keyword 0.6%0.6%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 2.1%2.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Anecdotal: Keyword 41.0%, sitewide 5.2%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 29.0%, sitewide 9.1%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 28.5%, sitewide 15.9%Framing Effect: Keyword 11.1%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 6.3%, sitewide 19.2%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 15.4%, sitewide 2.2%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 11.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 8.1%, sitewide 8.1%Halo Effect: Keyword 8.0%, sitewide 6.7%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 7.1%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Keyword 5.7%, sitewide 6.9%Optimism Bias: Keyword 3.8%, sitewide 6.0%Primacy Effect: Keyword 5.5%, sitewide 0.9%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 5.3%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 4.7%, sitewide 1.9%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 3.7%Loss Aversion: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 2.5%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 3.1%Recency Bias: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 2.7%Bandwagon: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 2.2%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 1.9%Blind-Spot Bias: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 0.2%AnecdotalSitewide rateKeyword rate