Keyword summary
0% 6 analyzed articles/videos 6,417 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Chad Bianco results contain 50 faulty reasoning types, including Ad Hominem , Appeal to Emotion , and Hasty Generalization , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 11.8% saturation with 2,299 hits . Analysis detected 21,781 faulty-reasoning hits from 19,547 analyzed words across 6 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.2% and a BS Rank of 33% (25,228 of 37,326 keywords). This Chad Bianco is better (less manipulative) than 67.60% of the peer group. Chad Bianco
Keyword details
Total words: 19,547
Article count: 6
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
32% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 32.4% percentile 2.2% BS Score6 analyzed articles19.5K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 6.4% 6.4% Ad Hominem Sitewide 2.2% Keyword 10.6% 10.6% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 7.8% 7.8% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 11.8% 11.8% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 3.7% 3.7% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 3.6% 3.6% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 3.1% 3.1% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 2.6% 2.6% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Keyword 1.7% 1.7% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Keyword 0.7% 0.7% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 6.4%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 11.8%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 7.8%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 3.7%, sitewide 11.1% Ad Hominem: Keyword 10.6%, sitewide 2.2% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 3.6%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 6.5%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 4.4%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 4.3%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 3.3% False Dilemma: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 1.5% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 2.7% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 1.9% Loss Aversion: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 2.5% Politically Right Leaning Bias: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 1.4% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst