Keyword summary
0% 2 analyzed articles/videos 1,787 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Cesar Chavez Street results contain 31 faulty reasoning types, including Recency Bias , Appeal to Emotion , and In-Group Bias , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 12.5% saturation with 592 hits . Analysis detected 4,082 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,719 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.8% and a BS Rank of 48% (19,512 of 37,536 keywords). This Cesar Chavez Street is better (less manipulative) than 52.00% of the peer group. Cesar Chavez Street
Keyword details
Total words: 4,719
Article count: 2
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
48% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 48.0% percentile 2.8% BS Score2 analyzed articles4.7K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 12.6% 12.6% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 7.7% 7.7% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 0.4% 0.4% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 8.0% 8.0% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 0.2% 0.2% Recency Bias Sitewide 2.7% Keyword 9.9% 9.9% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 4.1% 4.1% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 1.5% 1.5% Bandwagon Sitewide 2.2% Keyword 7.5% 7.5% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 1.7% 1.7% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 12.6%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 7.7%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 8.0%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 4.1%, sitewide 11.1% Recency Bias: Keyword 9.9%, sitewide 2.7% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 8.1% In-Group Bias: Keyword 7.8%, sitewide 6.9% Bandwagon: Keyword 7.5%, sitewide 2.2% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 6.7% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 4.0% Indoctrination: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 0.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 3.1% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 2.2% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 2.7% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 2.0% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 1.9% False Dilemma: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 1.5% Red Herring: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 0.7% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst