Keyword summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Central Banking results contain 9 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Appeal to Emotion , and Halo Effect , with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 8.8% saturation with 106 hits . Analysis detected 340 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,210 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of 0% (0 of 37,536 keywords). This Central Banking is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group. Central Banking
Keyword details
Total words: 1,210
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
0% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 0.0% percentile 0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.2K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 5.6% 5.6% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 2.3% 2.3% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 1.3% 1.3% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 2.3% 2.3% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 8.8% 8.8% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Keyword 2.1% 2.1% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Keyword 2.2% 2.2% Self-Serving Bias Sitewide 3.7% Keyword 2.0% 2.0% Begging the Question Sitewide 1.7% Keyword 1.4% 1.4% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 5.6%, sitewide 26.9% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 15.9% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 9.1% Optimism Bias: Keyword 8.8%, sitewide 6.0% Halo Effect: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 6.7% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 3.7% Begging the Question: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 1.7% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst