Keyword summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 189 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Center For Strategic And International Studies results contain 14 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority , Halo Effect , and Negativity Bias , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 20.4% saturation with 154 hits . Analysis detected 1,012 faulty-reasoning hits from 756 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 9.6% and a BS Rank of 95% (2,116 of 37,536 keywords). This Center For Strategic And International Studies is worse (more manipulative) than 94.40% of the peer group. Center For Strategic And International Studies
Keyword details
Total words: 756
Article count: 1
Authors
?
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
94% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 94.4% percentile 9.6% BS Score1 analyzed articles756 analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Attempt to Sell a Product… Sitewide 0.5% Keyword 11.9% 11.9% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 4.6% 4.6% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 17.2% 17.2% Pessimism Bias Sitewide 1.9% Keyword 10.2% 10.2% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 18.4% 18.4% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 20.4% 20.4% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 13.0% 13.0% Begging the Question Sitewide 1.7% Keyword 7.4% 7.4% Ambiguity (Equivocation) Sitewide 0.8% Keyword 5.3% 5.3% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Keyword 2.8% 2.8% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 20.4%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 13.0%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 18.4%, sitewide 11.1% Halo Effect: Keyword 17.2%, sitewide 6.7% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 4.6%, sitewide 15.9% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Keyword 11.9%, sitewide 0.5% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 10.2%, sitewide 1.9% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 9.3%, sitewide 9.1% Begging the Question: Keyword 7.4%, sitewide 1.7% In-Group Bias: Keyword 4.5%, sitewide 6.9% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 6.2%, sitewide 5.3% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 5.3%, sitewide 0.8% Indoctrination: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 0.0% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst
CSIS 36% 6/30/2026, 1:00:00 AM