Keyword summary
47% 1 analyzed article/video 635 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Celtic Slave Trade results contain 21 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority , Confirmation Bias , and Ambiguity (Equivocation) , with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 11.3% saturation with 287 hits . Analysis detected 2,007 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,540 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.8% and a BS Rank of 68% (12,332 of 37,536 keywords). This Celtic Slave Trade is worse (more manipulative) than 67.10% of the peer group. Celtic Slave Trade
Keyword details
Total words: 2,540
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
67% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 67.1% percentile 3.8% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.5K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 3.2% 3.2% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 5.5% 5.5% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 2.4% 2.4% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 3.4% 3.4% Ambiguity (Equivocation) Sitewide 0.8% Keyword 6.0% 6.0% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 2.2% 2.2% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 11.3% 11.3% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Keyword 2.2% 2.2% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 2.6% 2.6% Recency Bias Sitewide 2.7% Keyword 0.5% 0.5% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 5.5%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 15.9% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 11.3%, sitewide 8.1% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 9.4%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 9.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 8.4%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 6.7% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 6.0%, sitewide 0.8% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 5.2% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 4.8%, sitewide 3.3% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 4.0%, sitewide 4.0% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 3.6%, sitewide 1.9% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.7% Unattributed Quote: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 1.1% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 0.5% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 1.9% Hindsight Bias: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 1.4% Indoctrination: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 0.0% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst