Keyword summary
0%1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Celebrity Businesses results contain 26 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Negativity Bias, and Ambiguity (Equivocation), with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 30.2% saturation with 620 hits. Analysis detected 2,915 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,056 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of 0% (0 of 37,536 keywords). This Celebrity Businesses is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
Celebrity Businesses
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Lieutenant Governor1%
0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
0%Texas Supreme Court1%
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
0%Celebrity Businesses (selected)0%
Keyword details
Total words: 2,056
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

0% percentile
02550751000.0% percentile
0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.1K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 30.2%30.2%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 4.4%4.4%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 1.5%1.5%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Keyword 7.3%7.3%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 2.4%2.4%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 22.0%22.0%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Keyword 1.2%1.2%Genetic FallacySitewide 1.4%Keyword 5.4%5.4%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 3.0%3.0%Red HerringSitewide 0.7%Keyword 4.0%4.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 30.2%, sitewide 5.3%Framing Effect: Keyword 22.0%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 21.7%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 4.4%, sitewide 15.9%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 6.7%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 7.5%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 7.3%, sitewide 0.8%Halo Effect: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 6.7%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 5.9%, sitewide 2.7%Genetic Fallacy: Keyword 5.4%, sitewide 1.4%Anecdotal: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 5.2%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 4.7%, sitewide 4.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 4.5%, sitewide 3.3%Red Herring: Keyword 4.0%, sitewide 0.7%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 3.7%Unattributed Quote: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 1.1%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 0.5%Ad Hominem: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 2.2%Appeal to Nature: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 0.2%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 1.4%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 1.9%Primacy Effect: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 0.9%Actor-Observer Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 0.6%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos