Keyword summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Celebrity Businesses results contain 26 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Negativity Bias , and Ambiguity (Equivocation) , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 30.2% saturation with 620 hits . Analysis detected 2,915 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,056 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of 0% (0 of 37,536 keywords). This Celebrity Businesses is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group. Celebrity Businesses
Keyword details
Total words: 2,056
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
0% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 0.0% percentile 0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.1K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Keyword SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 30.2% 30.2% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 4.4% 4.4% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 1.5% 1.5% Ambiguity (Equivocation) Sitewide 0.8% Keyword 7.3% 7.3% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 2.4% 2.4% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 22.0% 22.0% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Keyword 1.2% 1.2% Genetic Fallacy Sitewide 1.4% Keyword 5.4% 5.4% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 3.0% 3.0% Red Herring Sitewide 0.7% Keyword 4.0% 4.0% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 30.2%, sitewide 5.3% Framing Effect: Keyword 22.0%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 21.7%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 4.4%, sitewide 15.9% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 6.7%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 7.5% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 7.3%, sitewide 0.8% Halo Effect: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 6.7% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 5.9%, sitewide 2.7% Genetic Fallacy: Keyword 5.4%, sitewide 1.4% Anecdotal: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 5.2% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 4.7%, sitewide 4.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 4.5%, sitewide 3.3% Red Herring: Keyword 4.0%, sitewide 0.7% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 3.7% Unattributed Quote: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 1.1% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 0.5% Ad Hominem: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 2.2% Appeal to Nature: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 0.2% Politically Right Leaning Bias: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 1.4% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 1.9% Primacy Effect: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 0.9% Actor-Observer Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 0.6% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst