Keyword summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 820 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Cdc Director results contain 27 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority , Framing Effect , and Optimism Bias , with Halo Effect as the most egregious example at 26.2% saturation with 860 hits . Analysis detected 2,935 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,280 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.3% and a BS Rank of 60% (15,096 of 37,536 keywords). This Cdc Director is worse (more manipulative) than 59.80% of the peer group. Cdc Director
Keyword details
Total words: 3,280
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
60% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 59.8% percentile 3.3% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.3K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 6.3% 6.3% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 26.2% 26.2% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 1.4% 1.4% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 3.1% 3.1% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 2.3% 2.3% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 17.7% 17.7% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 1.5% 1.5% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 1.9% 1.9% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Keyword 0.8% 0.8% Post Hoc (False Cause) Sitewide 3.3% Keyword 0.4% 0.4% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 6.3%, sitewide 26.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 26.2%, sitewide 6.7% Negativity Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 17.7%, sitewide 11.1% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 15.9% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 9.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 6.9% Optimism Bias: Keyword 5.4%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 4.6% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 2.7% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 1.9% Begging the Question: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 1.7% Indoctrination: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 0.0% Bandwagon: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 2.2% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 0.5% Politically Right Leaning Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 1.4% Unattributed Quote: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 1.1% Straw Man: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 0.9% Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 0.0% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst