Keyword summary
0%1 analyzed article/video378 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Caylent results contain 28 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias, Halo Effect, and Appeal to Authority, with Attempt to Sell a Product or Service as the most egregious example at 36.6% saturation with 553 hits. Analysis detected 3,038 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,512 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 7.2% and a BS Rank of 91% (3,690 of 37,536 keywords). This Caylent is worse (more manipulative) than 90.20% of the peer group.
Caylent
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Lieutenant Governor1%
0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
0%Texas Supreme Court1%
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
91%Caylent (selected)8%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 1,512
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

90% percentile
025507510090.2% percentile
7.2% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.5K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Keyword 36.6%36.6%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Keyword 29.0%29.0%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 5.8%5.8%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 1.7%1.7%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 21.6%21.6%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Keyword 16.7%16.7%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 5.7%5.7%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 18.4%18.4%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 1.9%1.9%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Keyword 6.5%6.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Keyword 36.6%, sitewide 0.5%Optimism Bias: Keyword 29.0%, sitewide 6.0%Framing Effect: Keyword 5.8%, sitewide 26.9%Halo Effect: Keyword 21.6%, sitewide 6.7%Negativity Bias: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 18.4%, sitewide 11.1%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 16.7%, sitewide 4.6%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 5.7%, sitewide 15.9%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 11.0%, sitewide 8.1%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 9.3%, sitewide 5.3%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 9.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 4.2%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 6.9%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 6.5%, sitewide 0.8%Anecdotal: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 5.2%Unattributed Quote: Keyword 4.6%, sitewide 1.1%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 3.3%False Dilemma: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 1.5%Recency Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 2.7%Indoctrination: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 0.0%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 2.2%Begging the Question: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 1.7%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 1.9%Attempt to Sell a Product or ServiceSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos