Keyword summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video791 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Catholic Church Sexual Abuse results contain 25 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization, Appeal to Authority, and Optimism Bias, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 16.5% saturation with 392 hits. Analysis detected 2,253 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,373 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.8% and a BS Rank of ⁠68% (12,133 of 37,536 keywords). This Catholic Church Sexual Abuse is worse (more manipulative) than 67.70% of the peer group.
Catholic Church Sexual Abuse
Keyword ranking list
Keyword details
Total words: 2,373
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

68% percentile
025507510067.7% percentile
3.8% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.4K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 3.7%3.7%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 5.8%5.8%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 2.7%2.7%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Keyword 0.6%0.6%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 7.3%7.3%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 5.4%5.4%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 2.1%2.1%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Keyword 2.1%2.1%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Keyword 6.6%6.6%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Keyword 5.9%5.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 3.7%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 5.8%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 16.5%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 7.3%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 5.4%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 7.5%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 7.5%Optimism Bias: Keyword 6.8%, sitewide 6.0%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 6.6%, sitewide 3.7%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 5.9%, sitewide 4.0%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 5.2%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 4.8%, sitewide 3.3%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 4.6%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 2.7%Slippery Slope: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 1.7%Recency Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 2.5%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 1.9%False Dilemma: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 1.5%Hindsight Bias: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 1.4%Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 0.0%Sunk Cost Effect: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 0.3%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 0.8%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos