Keyword summary
85%1 analyzed article/video604 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Catherine Grace Garner results contain 23 faulty reasoning types, including Halo Effect, Availability Heuristic, and Framing Effect, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 27.6% saturation with 666 hits. Analysis detected 1,953 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,416 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.5% and a BS Rank of 73% (15,059 of 55,265 keywords). This Catherine Grace Garner is worse (more manipulative) than 72.80% of the peer group.
Catherine Grace Garner
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Property Transfers1%
0%Madison Township1%
0%Buc-Ee's Travel Center1%
0%Buc Ees Travel Center1%
0%Paul Demark1%
73%Catherine Grace Garner (selected)4%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 2,416
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

73% percentile
025507510072.8% percentile
3.5% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.4K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 3.7%3.7%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 27.6%27.6%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 0.8%0.8%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 1.9%1.9%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 15.4%15.4%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 1.1%1.1%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 2.7%2.7%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 3.9%3.9%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Keyword 2.3%2.3%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Keyword 1.6%1.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 27.6%, sitewide 5.3%Framing Effect: Keyword 3.7%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 15.9%Halo Effect: Keyword 15.4%, sitewide 6.7%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 3.9%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 7.5%Optimism Bias: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 4.6%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 3.7%Recency Bias: Keyword 3.6%, sitewide 2.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 3.3%Hindsight Bias: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 1.4%Bandwagon: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 1.9%False Dilemma: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 1.5%Composition/Division: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 0.2%Unattributed Quote: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 1.1%Indoctrination: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 0.0%Burden of Proof: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 0.4%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos