Keyword summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 1,260 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Cat Research results contain 33 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization , Optimism Bias , and Overconfidence Bias , with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 7.3% saturation with 276 hits . Analysis detected 2,712 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,780 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.2% and a BS Rank of 31% (26,118 of 37,538 keywords). This Cat Research is better (less manipulative) than 69.60% of the peer group. Cat Research
Keyword details
Total words: 3,780
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
30% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 30.4% percentile 2.2% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.8K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 3.8% 3.8% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 2.8% 2.8% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 3.3% 3.3% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 1.0% 1.0% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 4.1% 4.1% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 2.3% 2.3% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 7.3% 7.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias Sitewide 3.1% Keyword 0.5% 0.5% Appeal to Nature Sitewide 0.2% Keyword 2.7% 2.7% Recency Bias Sitewide 2.7% Keyword 0.3% 0.3% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 3.8%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 7.3%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 4.1%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 7.0%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 6.3%, sitewide 6.0% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 5.4%, sitewide 4.6% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 4.8%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 5.2% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.7% Appeal to Nature: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 0.2% Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.5% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 1.9% Begging the Question: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 1.7% False Dilemma: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 1.5% Hindsight Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 1.4% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst