CBC Radio48%

5 feline facts to help see your cat in a new light 39%

By Olsy Sorokina0%

12/1/2023, 8:27:15 PM

BS Summary: This article contains 32 faulty reasoning types, including Overconfidence Bias, Biased Writer Voice, and Hasty Generalization, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 19.6% saturation with 247 hits. Analysis detected 2,160 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,260 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 44.3% and a BS Rank of 39% (13,151 of 21,229 articles). This article is better (less manipulative) than 61.90% of the article peer group.

Cats have lived alongside humans for millennia, but there's still much we don't know about our companions. 
How do cats purr? 
Why do they look so annoyed all the time? 
And when and where did cats begin sharing homes with humans? 
Part of the issue with finding the answers to these questions is the notoriously secretive nature of domestic cats and their unwillingness to do what they're told  something that makes studying cats in a laboratory setting quite challenging. 
But advances in technology and research methods in recent years have helped to shed light on some cat behaviour, pinpoint the origins of the species we know as the domestic cat, and even find a cure for a fatal feline disease. 
Here's some of the latest science about our feline companions. 
Cats' faces are more expressive than you think 
Humans have been trying to decode the meaning of their feline friends' facial expressions for a while, making some progress in studies of cat faces in interactions with humans. 
But what are their faces doing around other cats? 
To find out, researchers recorded videos at a Los Angeles, Calif., cat café to study the facial expressions the animals make while interacting among themselves. 
Using a facial muscle coding system, the scientists discovered that cats make 276 distinct facial expressions using 26 unique facial movements, such as parting their lips, licking their nose or squinting their eyes. 
Brittany Florkiewicz, a co-author of the new study, said the majority of those expressions could be categorized as either friendly or unfriendly. 
"We were able to find evidence for something called a 'play face,'" she told Quirks & Quarks host Bob McDonald. 
"And we actually have current studies that show that big cats are capable of producing these play faces as well." 
Florkiewicz, who has also studied ape facial expressions, said she was impressed by the range of expressions found in cats, comparable to over 300 expressions she has previously identified in chimpanzees. 
"It was really interesting to think about how domestication has shaped that facial expression repertoire, and then thinking about comparisons that we could potentially make with other species," she said. 
Cats are built to purr 
Regardless of what their face looks like, a telltale sign of a happy cat is the signature purr. 
But something that has puzzled scientists is how an animal as small as a domestic cat can produce sounds at such low frequencies. 
Tecumseh W. 
Fitch studied the physiology of cat larynges  the organ in the back of the throat involved in breathing and sound production, also known as the voice box  to figure this out. 
In his research, he identified a pair of fatty pads that help slow down the vibration of the vocal folds to make the low-frequency rumbling. 
"So what we think is that the cat is using one part of its vocal folds to produce… sounds like meows. 
And only using the full vocal fold with these fat inclusions to make for a lower-frequency purrs," he told Quirks & Quarks. 
These results, published in Current Biology, also challenge the common theory of the mechanics of purring. 
"What was thought until our study for cats is that  each pulse of the purr was actually accompanied by a muscle twitch that had to be driven by the cat, by a neural signal from the cat's brain," Fitch said. 
"And what we were able to show is that, that's not necessary for purring to occur." 
Cat hair can help solve crimes 
Here's a fact that doesn't need a research paper to back it up: cat hair gets everywhere. 
And while this may be bad news for your stylish all-black outfits, it's good news for forensic scientists. 
The potential of using cat hair to solve crimes has been known for some time now. 
In a 2023 U.K. manslaughter case, cat hairs left on the victim were matched to those found in a suspect's home, resulting in a conviction. 
But there are some challenges to using cat hair to identify wrongdoers. 
Cat hair doesn't contain as much genetic material as a swab of saliva or a drop of blood, "so we have to look at another kind," researcher Mark Jobling told Quirks & Quarks. 
"And that kind is called mitochondrial DNA." 
In a paper published in the journal Forensic Science International: Genetics, Jobling and his team describe how they were able to extract mitochondrial DNA from cat hair. 
Jobling said this test "can work with as little as a single cat hair" and hairs that are over 20 years old. 
This could be useful in cold cases where cat hair is included in the evidence, since unlike blood or saliva, DNA in hair degrades more slowly over time. 
Cats can get sick with coronaviruses  and better with COVID-19 antivirals 
The COVID-19 pandemic brought extra concerns for cat owners too, as reports emerged of tigers and domestic cats testing positive for the virus. 
But long before SARS-CoV-2, there was a different coronavirus plaguing the feline population. 
"The standard cat coronavirus, it's all over the world. 
And most cats, if they go outside, they catch it," said feline infectious disease specialist Danielle Gunn-Moore. 
For most cats that catch this virus, it shows up as some mild diarrhea. 
But in a small percentage of animals, the virus mutates into a deadly disease called feline infectious peritonitis (FIP). 
Until recently, the FIP diagnosis was a death sentence. 
But when antiviral medicine for SARS-CoV-2 became available, it turned out that these drugs are incredibly effective as FIP treatment. 
When Gunn-Moore and her colleagues tested the antiviral drugs in a population of over 300 cats, treatment was effective in 85 per cent of the animals. 
"It's like fate has given us the most wonderful gift of ... something we can treat this devastating disease with," Gunn-Moore said. 
And it came at just the right time, as a particularly deadly strain of the cat coronavirus was devastating the numerous population of feral cats in Cyprus. 
Gunn-Moore and her colleagues are now building on the success of the antiviral treatment to develop a more effective vaccine against FIP. 
Even when they're curled up in your lap, cats have "one paw in the wild" 
Analysis of ancient cat DNA  including numerous cat mummies found in Egypt  has helped scientists conclude that the the domestic cats species, Felis catus, originated in the North African wild cat. 
But as author Jonathan B. 
Losos explores in his new book, The Cat's Meow: How the Cats Evolved from the Savanna to Your Sofa, much of our cats' behaviour remains on the wild side. 
"One thing about unowned outdoor cats is they very quickly revert to their wild existence," Losos told Quirks & Quarks. 
"They have, if you will, one paw still in the wild, because it's very easy for them to revert and basically go back to living like their ancestors did, hunting and getting by quite well." 
Studies of feral cat colonies also show an internal hierarchy different from most other species of cats, wild or domestic. 
"Cats have a reputation of being aloof loners that live by themselves ... not being very friendly to each other. 
It turns out that at least in some circumstances, that could not be further from the truth," Losos said. 
"Domestic cats, when they're living at high densities, form into prides just like lions." 
These groups groom each other and play together, and even nurse each other's young. 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 2.9%Olsy Sorokina: 1.0%CBC: 2.6%Confirmation Bias2.9%This article: 0.0%Olsy Sorokina: 0.0%CBC: 0.7%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 10.4%Olsy Sorokina: 4.1%CBC: 3.1%Availability Heuristic10.4%This article: 1.1%Olsy Sorokina: 2.0%CBC: 1.1%Representativeness Heuristic1.1%This article: 3.3%Olsy Sorokina: 1.1%CBC: 0.9%Hindsight Bias3.3%This article: 14.5%Olsy Sorokina: 5.4%CBC: 1.4%Overconfidence Bias14.5%This article: 7.8%Olsy Sorokina: 3.8%CBC: 4.2%Framing Effect7.8%This article: 1.4%Olsy Sorokina: 0.5%CBC: 0.6%Loss Aversion1.4%This article: 3.9%Olsy Sorokina: 1.3%CBC: 0.6%Status Quo Bias3.9%This article: 1.7%Olsy Sorokina: 0.6%CBC: 0.2%Sunk Cost Effect1.7%This article: 10.1%Olsy Sorokina: 6.3%CBC: 4.0%Optimism Bias10.1%This article: 0.7%Olsy Sorokina: 0.5%CBC: 1.4%Pessimism Bias0.7%This article: 8.5%Olsy Sorokina: 2.8%CBC: 5.6%Negativity Bias8.5%This article: 0.0%Olsy Sorokina: 0.0%CBC: 1.2%Self-Serving Bias0.0%This article: 3.1%Olsy Sorokina: 2.1%CBC: 0.9%Fundamental Attribution Error3.1%This article: 0.0%Olsy Sorokina: 0.0%CBC: 0.2%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Olsy Sorokina: 0.0%CBC: 1.2%In-Group Bias0.0%This article: 1.6%Olsy Sorokina: 0.5%CBC: 0.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias1.6%This article: 4.3%Olsy Sorokina: 2.2%CBC: 3.7%Halo Effect4.3%This article: 0.0%Olsy Sorokina: 0.0%CBC: 0.1%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Olsy Sorokina: 0.0%CBC: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 0.8%Olsy Sorokina: 0.3%CBC: 1.2%Recency Bias0.8%This article: 3.1%Olsy Sorokina: 1.0%CBC: 0.4%Primacy Effect3.1%This article: 0.0%Olsy Sorokina: 0.0%CBC: 0.0%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Olsy Sorokina: 0.0%CBC: 0.4%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 1.5%Olsy Sorokina: 0.5%CBC: 0.2%Straw Man1.5%This article: 19.6%Olsy Sorokina: 7.3%CBC: 3.7%Appeal to Authority19.6%This article: 1.5%Olsy Sorokina: 0.5%CBC: 1.3%False Dilemma1.5%This article: 0.0%Olsy Sorokina: 0.0%CBC: 0.4%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%Olsy Sorokina: 0.0%CBC: 0.2%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 13.4%Olsy Sorokina: 7.0%CBC: 4.9%Hasty Generalization13.4%This article: 0.7%Olsy Sorokina: 0.2%CBC: 0.2%Red Herring0.7%This article: 0.0%Olsy Sorokina: 0.0%CBC: 0.6%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 6.3%Olsy Sorokina: 3.3%CBC: 4.3%Appeal to Emotion6.3%This article: 2.4%Olsy Sorokina: 0.8%CBC: 0.6%Begging the Question2.4%This article: 6.0%Olsy Sorokina: 2.0%CBC: 2.5%Post Hoc (False Cause)6.0%This article: 0.0%Olsy Sorokina: 0.0%CBC: 0.0%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 0.0%Olsy Sorokina: 0.0%CBC: 0.3%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 8.0%Olsy Sorokina: 2.7%CBC: 0.3%Appeal to Nature8.0%This article: 0.0%Olsy Sorokina: 0.4%CBC: 0.3%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 8.3%Olsy Sorokina: 3.4%CBC: 3.3%Anecdotal8.3%This article: 2.8%Olsy Sorokina: 0.9%CBC: 0.1%No True Scotsman2.8%This article: 2.5%Olsy Sorokina: 0.8%CBC: 1.6%Ambiguity (Equivocation)2.5%This article: 0.0%Olsy Sorokina: 0.0%CBC: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Olsy Sorokina: 0.0%CBC: 0.1%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Olsy Sorokina: 0.0%CBC: 0.1%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Olsy Sorokina: 0.0%CBC: 0.1%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Olsy Sorokina: 0.0%CBC: 0.1%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 3.2%Olsy Sorokina: 1.1%CBC: 1.1%Unattributed Quote3.2%This article: 1.6%Olsy Sorokina: 0.5%CBC: 0.8%Quote-first Misdirection1.6%This article: 14.5%Olsy Sorokina: 4.8%CBC: 4.8%Biased Writer Voice14.5%This article: 0.0%Olsy Sorokina: 0.0%CBC: 2.4%Indoctrination0.0%This article: 0.0%Olsy Sorokina: 0.0%CBC: 0.4%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Olsy Sorokina: 0.0%CBC: 0.1%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Olsy Sorokina: 0.0%CBC: 1.7%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…0.0%

1260 words analyzed.

Speakers

5speakers40%attributed speech761writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 12 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 17 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 4 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 9 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 11 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 39 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 41 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 10 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 8 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 29 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 9 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 25 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 33 words • 0.0% coverageBrittany Florkiewicz • 22 words • 0.0% coverageBrittany Florkiewicz • 20 words • 100.0% coverageBrittany Florkiewicz • 20 words • 100.0% coverageBrittany Florkiewicz • 31 words • 0.0% coverageBrittany Florkiewicz • 30 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 5 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 18 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 23 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 2 words • 0.0% coverageTecumseh W. Fitch • 33 words • 0.0% coverageTecumseh W. Fitch • 25 words • 0.0% coverageTecumseh W. Fitch • 21 words • 0.0% coverageTecumseh W. Fitch • 22 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 16 words • 0.0% coverageTecumseh W. Fitch • 41 words • 0.0% coverageTecumseh W. Fitch • 16 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 6 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 17 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 18 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 16 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 25 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 12 words • 0.0% coverageMark Jobling • 33 words • 0.0% coverageMark Jobling • 7 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 27 words • 0.0% coverageMark Jobling • 22 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 28 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 12 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 23 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 13 words • 100.0% coverageDanielle Gunn-Moore • 9 words • 0.0% coverageDanielle Gunn-Moore • 17 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 14 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 19 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 9 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 20 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 26 words • 0.0% coverageDanielle Gunn-Moore • 22 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 27 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 22 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 15 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 33 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 5 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 29 words • 0.0% coverageJonathan B. Losos • 20 words • 0.0% coverageJonathan B. Losos • 35 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 20 words • 0.0% coverageJonathan B. Losos • 20 words • 0.0% coverageJonathan B. Losos • 19 words • 0.0% coverageJonathan B. Losos • 14 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 14 words • 0.0% coverage
Selected voice

Danielle Gunn-Moore

100%flagged-word coverage
48 attributed words9.6% of attributed speech92% writer coverage
0%25.0%50.0%Biased Writer Voice+24.7 ptsWriter: 21.2%Danielle Gunn-Moore: 45.8%45.8%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.