Keyword summary
0%2 analyzed articles/videos1,042 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Cass County results contain 33 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Loss Aversion, and Indoctrination, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 12.9% saturation with 499 hits. Analysis detected 3,012 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,872 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.4% and a BS Rank of 37% (22,211 of 34,832 keywords). This Cass County is better (less manipulative) than 63.80% of the peer group.
Cass County
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
0%Javian Hawkins1%
0%Atlanta Falcons1%
0%Anthony Romano1%
37%Cass County (selected)3%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 3,872
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

36% percentile
025507510036.2% percentile
2.4% BS Score2 analyzed articles3.9K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 7.2%7.2%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 3.2%3.2%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 1.0%1.0%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 2.0%2.0%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 0.8%0.8%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 12.9%12.9%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Keyword 6.2%6.2%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Keyword 0.3%0.3%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 2.7%2.7%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Keyword 0.9%0.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 7.2%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 12.9%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Keyword 4.2%, sitewide 6.9%Loss Aversion: Keyword 6.7%, sitewide 2.5%Indoctrination: Keyword 6.2%, sitewide 0.0%Optimism Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 5.2%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 4.8%, sitewide 3.7%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 4.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 2.7%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 1.9%Recency Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 2.7%False Dilemma: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 1.5%Bandwagon: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 1.9%Slippery Slope: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 1.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate