Keyword summary
0% 4 analyzed articles/videos 2,718 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Carrie Underwood results contain 41 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Halo Effect , and Ad Hominem , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 10.9% saturation with 1,189 hits . Analysis detected 10,442 faulty-reasoning hits from 10,872 analyzed words across 4 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.3% and a BS Rank of 36% (22,817 of 35,675 keywords). This Carrie Underwood is better (less manipulative) than 64.00% of the peer group. Carrie Underwood
Keyword details
Total words: 10,872
Article count: 4
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
36% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 36.0% percentile 2.3% BS Score4 analyzed articles10.9K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 4.5% 4.5% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 2.8% 2.8% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 1.4% 1.4% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 10.2% 10.2% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 10.9% 10.9% Ad Hominem Sitewide 2.2% Keyword 7.8% 7.8% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 2.1% 2.1% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 3.8% 3.8% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 1.1% 1.1% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 2.1% 2.1% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 4.5%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 10.2%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 11.1% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 10.9%, sitewide 5.3% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 3.8%, sitewide 9.1% Halo Effect: Keyword 8.3%, sitewide 6.7% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 6.9%, sitewide 8.1% Ad Hominem: Keyword 7.8%, sitewide 2.2% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 6.9% Optimism Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 5.2% Unattributed Quote: Keyword 4.8%, sitewide 1.1% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 4.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 4.0%, sitewide 3.3% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 3.7% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 2.0% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 3.1% Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 0.0% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 2.5% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst