Keyword summary
0% 3 analyzed articles/videos 2,562 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Carlos Mendoza results contain 40 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Fundamental Attribution Error , and Confirmation Bias , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 12.4% saturation with 1,165 hits . Analysis detected 9,080 faulty-reasoning hits from 9,359 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.4% and a BS Rank of 39% (23,141 of 37,536 keywords). This Carlos Mendoza is better (less manipulative) than 61.60% of the peer group. Carlos Mendoza
Keyword details
Total words: 9,359
Article count: 3
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
38% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 38.4% percentile 2.4% BS Score3 analyzed articles9.4K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 1.8% 1.8% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 3.2% 3.2% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 8.6% 8.6% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 1.4% 1.4% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 12.4% 12.4% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 0.6% 0.6% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 2.9% 2.9% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 4.3% 4.3% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Keyword 0.6% 0.6% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 2.7% 2.7% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 8.6%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 15.9% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 12.4%, sitewide 5.3% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 4.3%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 5.3%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 3.6%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 6.0% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 5.7%, sitewide 2.7% Anecdotal: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 5.2% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 5.2%, sitewide 3.3% Recency Bias: Keyword 4.7%, sitewide 2.7% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 4.6% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 4.5%, sitewide 1.9% False Dilemma: Keyword 4.4%, sitewide 1.5% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 3.7% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 3.1% Hindsight Bias: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 1.4% Indoctrination: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 0.0% Ad Hominem: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst