Keyword summary
0% 2 analyzed articles/videos 2,374 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Carl Grillmair results contain 42 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority , Confirmation Bias , and Anecdotal , with Halo Effect as the most egregious example at 16.3% saturation with 928 hits . Analysis detected 8,904 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,690 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.7% and a BS Rank of 67% (12,515 of 37,536 keywords). This Carl Grillmair is worse (more manipulative) than 66.70% of the peer group. Carl Grillmair
Keyword details
Total words: 5,690
Article count: 2
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
67% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 66.7% percentile 3.7% BS Score2 analyzed articles5.7K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 8.6% 8.6% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 8.0% 8.0% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 16.3% 16.3% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Keyword 11.2% 11.2% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 10.3% 10.3% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 0.8% 0.8% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 2.0% 2.0% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 12.3% 12.3% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 14.3% 14.3% Self-Serving Bias Sitewide 3.7% Keyword 0.6% 0.6% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 8.6%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 8.0%, sitewide 19.2% Halo Effect: Keyword 16.3%, sitewide 6.7% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 10.3%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 14.3%, sitewide 11.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 12.3%, sitewide 7.5% Anecdotal: Keyword 11.2%, sitewide 5.2% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 10.2%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 6.4%, sitewide 8.1% In-Group Bias: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 6.9% Optimism Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 5.3%, sitewide 5.3% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 4.7%, sitewide 3.3% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 4.0% Recency Bias: Keyword 3.8%, sitewide 2.7% Unattributed Quote: Keyword 3.7%, sitewide 1.1% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 3.7% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 1.9% Politically Right Leaning Bias: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 1.4% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 2.7% Burden of Proof: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 0.4% Hindsight Bias: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 1.4% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 1.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst