CBC News49%

Killing of Calgary-born scientist tied to mysterious U.S. deaths, disappearances despite quick arrest 97%

By Chris Iorfida0%

4/23/2026, 6:39:39 AM

BS Summary: This article contains 34 faulty reasoning types, including Confirmation Bias, Availability Heuristic, and Post Hoc (False Cause), with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 18.3% saturation with 262 hits. Analysis detected 3,850 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,432 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 95% and a BS Rank of 97% (718 of 21,887 articles). This article is worse (more manipulative) than 96.70% of the article peer group.

The shooting death of a Calgary-born astrophysicist in mid-February in front of his Southern California residence sent shockwaves through his academic and professional circles. 
Carl Grillmair was an undergraduate at the University of Calgary before earning a master’s degree from the University of Victoria, eventually earning his PhD outside of Canada. 
In the 1990s, he joined the California Institute of Technology's Infrared Processing and Analysis Center, which partners with NASA on a wide range of research activities. 
Grillmair, 67 at the time of his death, accumulated accolades while at CalTech. 
In 2011 he was awarded NASA's Exceptional Scientific Achievement Medal after having studied deep space on a number of NASA telescopes. 
"His methods on exoplanets and galactic structure studies were truly detective work, allowing him to infer events that took place many billions of years ago," said CalTech astronomer Sergio Fajardoa-Acosta, calling Grillmair "irreplaceable." 
Two days after Grillmair was killed on Feb. 16, a 29-year-old who lived two miles away in Llano, Calif., was charged with his murder. 
Freddy Snyder is scheduled to face arraignment next week. 
While all defendants deserve the presumption of innocence, and a Los Angeles County Sheriff's spokesperson admitted it doesn't appear the victim and alleged killer knew each other personally, police appear satisfied they have their man. 
James Comer, Republican chair of the House oversight committee, seen here in Washington on March 19, has expressed skepticism that the deaths and disappearances in the past three years of a number of scientists and government employees are just a coincidence. 
Nevertheless, Grillmair's name has surfaced for weeks as being part of a cluster of deaths and disappearances of scientists working for the U.S. government or adjacently in academia that have been deemed suspicious by online sleuths. 
This week, officials from Donald Trump's administration and his Republican Party confirmed they will investigate. 
‘Doesn't pass the smell test’ 
Republicans James Comer and Eric Burlison of the House's oversight committee said the panel will examine the disappearances and deaths since 2023 of "at least 10 individuals" with a connection to U.S. nuclear secrets or rocket technology, and that those cases "may represent a grave threat to U.S. national security and to U.S. personnel with access to scientific secrets." 
Adding confusion to the matter, Comer of Kentucky posted hours later that the death of "at least 11 of America's top scientists" in those areas is "fishy and doesn't pass the smell test." 
Meanwhile, the FBI  which since 2025 has cut back on the tracking of both domestic extremism monitoring and tracking of foreign election interfence attempts  told the right-wing news outlet Daily Caller this week it's "spearheading the effort to look for connections into the missing and deceased scientists." 
🚨 BREAKING: @RepJamesComer and @RepEricBurlison are seeking to uncover the truth behind missing scientists.<br><br>We’re requesting info from the FBI, NASA, and the Departments of War and Energy that will help us investigate this matter and protect our country. https://t.co/zM4eZS2xKL 
Burlison told NewsNation he wouldn't be surprised "if our adversaries, China, Russia, Iran, or any other adversary saw an opportunity to take out some of our nation’s top scientists." 
The probes have been cheered by some true crime podcasters, but there are dissenters to Burlison's line of thinking. 
Pentagon report says no verifiable evidence UAPs are aliens 
NASA wants to shift talk on unexplained sightings 'from sensationalism to science' 
Daniel Engber, a writer known to debunk junk science studies, was scathing in the Atlantic, deeming it "another piece of flagrant nonsense [that] has ascended to the highest levels of U.S. politics and media." 
"To call it a conspiracy theory would be far too kind, because no comprehensive theory has been floated to explain the pattern of events," he said. 
Pattern 'not real' 
Mick West, author of 2018's Escaping the Rabbit Hole: How to Debunk Conspiracy Theories Using Facts, Logic, and Respect, is also unimpressed by the supposed connections. 
"The deaths are real. 
The families’ grief is real. 
The pattern is not," he wrote on his Substack page. 
West characterizes what is occuring as a "death list fallacy." 
The most famous occurrence in modern times arguably stems from when a few authors in the 1960s compiled lists and cast a suspicious eye toward the deaths of many people closely or even tangentially connected to President John F. 
Kennedy, his assassin Lee Harvey Oswald, and Oswald's killer, nightclub owner Jack Ruby. 
Democratic House Rep. 
James Walkinshaw of Virginia said he does not believe a foreign adversary is targeting American scientists. 
West, using a sample size of what he estimated to be about 700,000 individuals with top secret clearance in the aerospace and nuclear agency work population, argues that ordinary mortality averages for such a population over a 22-month period would result in about 4,000 deaths, 70 homicides and 180 suicides. 
James Walkinshaw of Virginia, one of few Democrats to comment on the list of names, suggested to CNN on Tuesday that the connections may be specious beyond statistical probabilities. 
“The United States has thousands of nuclear scientists and nuclear experts,” Walkinshaw told CNN this week. 
“It’s not the kind of nuclear program that potentially a foreign adversary could significantly impact by targeting 10 individuals.” 
The most recent disappearance is that of retired major-general Neil McCasland, 68 years old. 
McCasland, who once led the Air Force Research Laboratory at the Wright-Patterson base in Ohio, has not been seen since Feb. 27 in his hometown of Albuquerque, N.M., and his revolver is reportedly missing. 
"He was on our list to talk to, and he disappeared, so that kind of piqued our interest," Burlison recently told News Nation, presumably referring to the topic of unidentified anomalous phenomena, or UFOs, which has animated the committee for two years. 
The local sheriff's office responsible for investigating his disappearance has said publicly there hasn't been evidence yet linking it to his classified work. 
Susan McCasland Wilkerson has alluded to unspecified health issues her husband has dealt with, and is also dubious. 
LISTEN | Fellow scientist remembers Nuno Loureiro : 
"He retired from the [air force] almost 13 years ago and has had only very commonly held clearances since," she said in a Facebook post. 
"It seems quite unlikely that he was taken to extract very dated secrets from him." 
McCasland Wilkerson also suggested her husband's unpaid consulting work for an UFO research organization led by Blink-182 member Tom DeLonge was so inconsequential as to not merit idle speculation. 
It's not clear why adversaries would resort to homicide or forced disappearances in an era of increasing cyber capabilities. 
And other individual cases might also not stand up to scrutiny as having been the work of nefarious agents working for clandestine or political purposes. 
As Engber points out, Melissa Casias, was a 53-year-old administrative assistant at the Los Alamos National Laboratory, not a scientist. 
Casias's husband worked at the same lab in a more senior position  which could complicate any murder or abduction theory that connects her downfall to her work. 
Her daughter told NBC's Dateline her mother was dealing with a "huge amount of stress" ahead of her 2025 disappearance. 
The official cause of death is not known for Jason Thomas, a 48-year-old Novartis "pharmaceutical researcher" as described in the Comey-Burlison letter. 
Thomas's body was found at a Massachusetts lake, and it is known that his parents had died in quick succession not long before his disappearance. 
Monica Reza, who worked as the director of materials processing for NASA’s Jet Propulsion Laboratory in California, was reportedly about 30 feet from a hiking companion on the Waterman Trail last year at Angeles National Forest when she was last seen. 
Accidental hiking deaths are not unheard of, including near that very trail, where a woman was ruled to have died from hypothermia four years earlier. 
Investigators probe links between Brown University shooting, MIT professor killing 
The "MIT scientist working on nuclear fusion" mentioned in the Comey-Burlison letter seemingly refers to Nuno Loureiro, gunned down in December. 
But his purported killer, Claudio Neves Valente, was an acquaintance dating back many years to their native Portugal, and Valente also committed a deadly mass shooting at Brown University before killing himself. 
After Grillmair's death, local residents told the Los Angeles Times of erratic behaviour exhibited by Snyder, perhaps not the behaviour of a stealth assassin. 
Grillmair reportedly called the police in late 2025 to report an incident of alleged trespassing by Snyder, perhaps offering a more prosaic motive for the deadly violence that followed weeks later. 
LISTEN | The FBI under Kash Patel: 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 16.5%Chris Iorfida: 19.7%CBC: 2.6%Confirmation Bias16.5%This article: 3.1%Chris Iorfida: 1.6%CBC: 0.7%Anchoring Bias3.1%This article: 16.0%Chris Iorfida: 16.5%CBC: 3.1%Availability Heuristic16.0%This article: 7.4%Chris Iorfida: 3.7%CBC: 1.1%Representativeness Heuristic7.4%This article: 3.8%Chris Iorfida: 1.9%CBC: 1.0%Hindsight Bias3.8%This article: 7.3%Chris Iorfida: 3.6%CBC: 1.4%Overconfidence Bias7.3%This article: 10.5%Chris Iorfida: 5.3%CBC: 4.2%Framing Effect10.5%This article: 0.0%Chris Iorfida: 0.0%CBC: 0.6%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 2.0%Chris Iorfida: 1.0%CBC: 0.6%Status Quo Bias2.0%This article: 0.0%Chris Iorfida: 0.0%CBC: 0.2%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Chris Iorfida: 0.0%CBC: 4.0%Optimism Bias0.0%This article: 8.9%Chris Iorfida: 4.5%CBC: 1.4%Pessimism Bias8.9%This article: 18.3%Chris Iorfida: 10.9%CBC: 5.7%Negativity Bias18.3%This article: 0.0%Chris Iorfida: 0.0%CBC: 1.2%Self-Serving Bias0.0%This article: 3.8%Chris Iorfida: 1.9%CBC: 0.9%Fundamental Attribution Error3.8%This article: 0.0%Chris Iorfida: 0.0%CBC: 0.2%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Chris Iorfida: 0.0%CBC: 1.2%In-Group Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Chris Iorfida: 0.0%CBC: 0.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 12.0%Chris Iorfida: 7.2%CBC: 3.6%Halo Effect12.0%This article: 0.0%Chris Iorfida: 0.0%CBC: 0.1%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Chris Iorfida: 0.0%CBC: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 13.3%Chris Iorfida: 6.6%CBC: 1.2%Recency Bias13.3%This article: 0.0%Chris Iorfida: 0.0%CBC: 0.4%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Chris Iorfida: 0.0%CBC: 0.0%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 2.4%Chris Iorfida: 2.4%CBC: 0.4%Ad Hominem2.4%This article: 0.0%Chris Iorfida: 0.9%CBC: 0.2%Straw Man0.0%This article: 15.2%Chris Iorfida: 10.8%CBC: 3.7%Appeal to Authority15.2%This article: 4.9%Chris Iorfida: 2.4%CBC: 1.3%False Dilemma4.9%This article: 0.0%Chris Iorfida: 0.0%CBC: 0.4%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%Chris Iorfida: 0.0%CBC: 0.2%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 6.0%Chris Iorfida: 7.9%CBC: 4.8%Hasty Generalization6.0%This article: 2.1%Chris Iorfida: 2.8%CBC: 0.2%Red Herring2.1%This article: 4.1%Chris Iorfida: 2.7%CBC: 0.6%Bandwagon4.1%This article: 10.9%Chris Iorfida: 8.5%CBC: 4.2%Appeal to Emotion10.9%This article: 5.4%Chris Iorfida: 4.1%CBC: 0.6%Begging the Question5.4%This article: 15.2%Chris Iorfida: 7.6%CBC: 2.5%Post Hoc (False Cause)15.2%This article: 0.0%Chris Iorfida: 0.0%CBC: 0.0%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 8.6%Chris Iorfida: 4.3%CBC: 0.3%Burden of Proof8.6%This article: 1.3%Chris Iorfida: 0.7%CBC: 0.3%Appeal to Nature1.3%This article: 0.0%Chris Iorfida: 0.7%CBC: 0.3%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 13.4%Chris Iorfida: 8.0%CBC: 3.3%Anecdotal13.4%This article: 2.0%Chris Iorfida: 1.0%CBC: 0.1%No True Scotsman2.0%This article: 8.0%Chris Iorfida: 4.0%CBC: 1.6%Ambiguity (Equivocation)8.0%This article: 0.0%Chris Iorfida: 0.0%CBC: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Chris Iorfida: 0.0%CBC: 0.1%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 1.0%Chris Iorfida: 2.7%CBC: 0.1%Personal Incredulity1.0%This article: 0.0%Chris Iorfida: 0.0%CBC: 0.1%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Chris Iorfida: 0.0%CBC: 0.1%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 14.9%Chris Iorfida: 7.4%CBC: 1.1%Unattributed Quote14.9%This article: 0.3%Chris Iorfida: 0.5%CBC: 0.8%Quote-first Misdirection0.3%This article: 11.6%Chris Iorfida: 10.5%CBC: 4.8%Biased Writer Voice11.6%This article: 2.7%Chris Iorfida: 1.4%CBC: 2.4%Indoctrination2.7%This article: 4.4%Chris Iorfida: 2.2%CBC: 0.4%Politically Left Leaning Bias4.4%This article: 11.5%Chris Iorfida: 5.7%CBC: 0.1%Politically Right Leaning Bias11.5%This article: 0.0%Chris Iorfida: 0.0%CBC: 1.7%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…0.0%

1432 words analyzed.

Speakers

9speakers36%attributed speech910writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 13 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 24 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 27 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 26 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 13 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 21 words • 0.0% coverageSergio Fajardoa-Acosta • 33 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 24 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 9 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 35 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 41 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 36 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 15 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 5 words • 100.0% coverageJames Comer • 59 words • 100.0% coverageJames Comer • 33 words • 100.0% coverageFBI • 49 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 39 words • 100.0% coverageEric Burlison • 29 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 19 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 9 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 12 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 34 words • 100.0% coverageDaniel Engber • 26 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 3 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 26 words • 100.0% coverageMick West • 4 words • 0.0% coverageMick West • 5 words • 0.0% coverageMick West • 10 words • 0.0% coverageMick West • 10 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 39 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 13 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 3 words • 0.0% coverageJames Walkinshaw • 16 words • 0.0% coverageMick West • 50 words • 0.0% coverageJames Walkinshaw • 29 words • 100.0% coverageJames Walkinshaw • 16 words • 0.0% coverageJames Walkinshaw • 19 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 14 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 34 words • 0.0% coverageEric Burlison • 42 words • 100.0% coverageLos Angeles County Sheriff's office • 23 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 18 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 8 words • 0.0% coverageSusan McCasland Wilkerson • 25 words • 100.0% coverageSusan McCasland Wilkerson • 15 words • 0.0% coverageSusan McCasland Wilkerson • 29 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 19 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 25 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 20 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 28 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 20 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 22 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 25 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 41 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 25 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 10 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 21 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 32 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 24 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 31 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 7 words • 0.0% coverage
Selected voice

James Comer

100%flagged-word coverage
92 attributed words18% of attributed speech93% writer coverage
0%32.5%65.0%Politically Right Leaning +58.0 ptsWriter: 6.2%James Comer: 64.1%64.1%Unattributed Quote+30.3 ptsWriter: 5.6%James Comer: 35.9%35.9%Biased Writer Voice-18.2 ptsWriter: 18.2%James Comer: 0.0%0.0%Indoctrination-4.3 ptsWriter: 4.3%James Comer: 0.0%0.0%Politically Left Leaning B-3.7 ptsWriter: 3.7%James Comer: 0.0%0.0%Quote-first Misdirection-0.5 ptsWriter: 0.5%James Comer: 0.0%0.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.