Keyword summary
78%1 analyzed article/video2,281 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Care Work results contain 41 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization, Appeal to Emotion, and Confirmation Bias, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 10.3% saturation with 707 hits. Analysis detected 6,808 faulty-reasoning hits from 6,843 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.4% and a BS Rank of 39% (21,994 of 35,715 keywords). This Care Work is better (less manipulative) than 61.60% of the peer group.
Care Work
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
0%Javian Hawkins1%
0%Atlanta Falcons1%
0%Anthony Romano1%
39%Care Work (selected)3%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 6,843
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

38% percentile
025507510038.4% percentile
2.4% BS Score1 analyzed articles6.8K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 3.1%3.1%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 10.3%10.3%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 3.4%3.4%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 8.6%8.6%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 2.2%2.2%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 0.1%0.1%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 2.1%2.1%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Keyword 4.6%4.6%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Keyword 0.3%0.3%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Keyword 2.2%2.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 10.3%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 8.6%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 11.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 9.7%, sitewide 8.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 9.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 7.0%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 6.9%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 6.8%, sitewide 3.3%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 6.8%, sitewide 5.3%Halo Effect: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Keyword 5.7%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 4.6%Indoctrination: Keyword 4.6%, sitewide 0.0%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 4.0%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 3.8%, sitewide 0.8%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 3.8%, sitewide 1.9%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 3.7%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 2.0%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.5%Ad Hominem: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos