Keyword summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 998 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Cardinal Christophe Pierre results contain 35 faulty reasoning types, including Politically Right Leaning Bias , Confirmation Bias , and Biased Writer Voice , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 8.3% saturation with 333 hits . Analysis detected 3,313 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,992 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.4% and a BS Rank of 37% (23,716 of 37,536 keywords). This Cardinal Christophe Pierre is better (less manipulative) than 63.20% of the peer group. Cardinal Christophe Pierre
Keyword details
Total words: 3,992
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
37% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 36.8% percentile 2.4% BS Score1 analyzed articles4K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Keyword SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 8.3% 8.3% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 4.0% 4.0% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 2.3% 2.3% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 1.1% 1.1% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 4.5% 4.5% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 1.6% 1.6% Politically Right Leaning… Sitewide 1.4% Keyword 7.8% 7.8% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Keyword 0.0% 0.0% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Keyword 0.7% 0.7% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 2.1% 2.1% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 8.3%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 4.0%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 4.5%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 8.1% Politically Right Leaning Bias: Keyword 7.8%, sitewide 1.4% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 7.3%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 4.7%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 3.7%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 5.0%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.0%, sitewide 4.6% Ad Hominem: Keyword 4.1%, sitewide 2.2% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 3.7% Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 3.7%, sitewide 0.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 3.1% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 0.8% Recency Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.7% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 2.2% False Dilemma: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 1.5% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 1.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst