Keyword summary
⁠84%2 analyzed articles/videos2,041 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Carbon results contain 42 faulty reasoning types, including Politically Right Leaning Bias, Confirmation Bias, and Appeal to Emotion, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 11.9% saturation with 727 hits. Analysis detected 8,981 faulty-reasoning hits from 6,123 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.5% and a BS Rank of ⁠63% (13,899 of 37,536 keywords). This Carbon is worse (more manipulative) than 63.00% of the peer group.
Carbon
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
⁠0%Lieutenant Governor1%
⁠0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
⁠0%Texas Supreme Court1%
⁠0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
⁠0%Running Back1%
⁠63%Carbon (selected)4%
⁠100%Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%Mike Lewis60%
⁠100%Joni Balter60%
⁠100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
⁠100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 6,123
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

63% percentile
025507510063.0% percentile
3.5% BS Score2 analyzed articles6.1K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 3.3%3.3%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 5.7%5.7%Politically Right Leaning…Sitewide 1.4%Keyword 11.5%11.5%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 2.2%2.2%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 11.9%11.9%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 9.9%9.9%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Keyword 0.1%0.1%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Keyword 9.2%9.2%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 5.9%5.9%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 2.3%2.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 5.7%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 9.9%, sitewide 15.9%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 11.9%, sitewide 5.3%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Keyword 11.5%, sitewide 1.4%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 5.9%, sitewide 11.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 10.1%, sitewide 7.5%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 9.4%, sitewide 8.1%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 9.2%, sitewide 3.3%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 9.1%In-Group Bias: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 6.7%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 6.5%, sitewide 4.6%Optimism Bias: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 5.2%Unattributed Quote: Keyword 4.7%, sitewide 1.1%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 4.0%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 4.0%, sitewide 0.8%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 3.7%False Dilemma: Keyword 3.7%, sitewide 1.5%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 1.9%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 3.1%Ad Hominem: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 2.2%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 2.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos