Keyword summary
0%1 analyzed article/video1,003 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Capital Gains Tax results contain 30 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Appeal to Emotion, and Ad Hominem, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 64.8% saturation with 1,299 hits. Analysis detected 5,178 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,006 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 8.6% and a BS Rank of 94% (2,604 of 37,530 keywords). This Capital Gains Tax is worse (more manipulative) than 93.10% of the peer group.
Capital Gains Tax
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Lieutenant Governor1%
0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
0%Texas Supreme Court1%
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
94%Capital Gains Tax (selected)9%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 2,006
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

93% percentile
025507510093.1% percentile
8.6% BS Score1 analyzed articles2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 64.8%64.8%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 42.6%42.6%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 31.9%31.9%Ad HominemSitewide 2.2%Keyword 13.4%13.4%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 1.6%1.6%Loss AversionSitewide 2.5%Keyword 9.2%9.2%Status Quo BiasSitewide 2.2%Keyword 8.3%8.3%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Keyword 0.5%0.5%Out-Group Homogeneity BiasSitewide 3.1%Keyword 8.3%8.3%Slippery SlopeSitewide 1.7%Keyword 6.7%6.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Framing Effect: Keyword 64.8%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 42.6%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 31.9%, sitewide 15.9%Ad Hominem: Keyword 13.4%, sitewide 2.2%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 8.6%, sitewide 11.1%In-Group Bias: Keyword 10.2%, sitewide 6.9%Loss Aversion: Keyword 9.2%, sitewide 2.5%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 9.1%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 8.3%, sitewide 2.2%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 8.3%, sitewide 3.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 5.7%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 7.5%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 6.7%, sitewide 1.9%Slippery Slope: Keyword 6.7%, sitewide 1.7%Optimism Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 6.0%Horn Effect: Keyword 4.9%, sitewide 1.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 4.7%, sitewide 3.3%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 4.3%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 4.0%Bandwagon: Keyword 4.0%, sitewide 2.2%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 4.0%, sitewide 0.8%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 3.7%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 3.6%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 2.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos