Keyword summary
0%2 analyzed articles/videos1,001 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Cap And Trade results contain 39 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Anecdotal, and Negativity Bias, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 22.9% saturation with 1,194 hits. Analysis detected 6,042 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,223 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 3% and a BS Rank of 52% (17,596 of 36,663 keywords). This Cap And Trade is worse (more manipulative) than 52.00% of the peer group.
Cap And Trade
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Texas Supreme Court1%
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
0%Javian Hawkins1%
0%Atlanta Falcons1%
52%Cap And Trade (selected)3%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 5,223
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

52% percentile
025507510052.0% percentile
3.0% BS Score2 analyzed articles5.2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 5.9%5.9%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 3.4%3.4%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 0.6%0.6%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 3.8%3.8%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 11.8%11.8%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 22.9%22.9%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 4.2%4.2%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 4.2%4.2%Slippery SlopeSitewide 1.7%Keyword 4.6%4.6%Out-Group Homogeneity BiasSitewide 3.1%Keyword 0.3%0.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 22.9%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 5.9%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 11.8%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 3.8%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 4.2%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 4.2%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Keyword 4.2%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 6.7%Anecdotal: Keyword 6.3%, sitewide 5.2%Optimism Bias: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 6.0%Slippery Slope: Keyword 4.6%, sitewide 1.7%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 4.6%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 4.5%, sitewide 3.3%Loss Aversion: Keyword 4.1%, sitewide 2.5%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 3.7%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 2.7%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 3.1%False Dilemma: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 1.5%Recency Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 2.7%Bandwagon: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 2.2%Begging the Question: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 1.7%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate