Keyword summary
0% 3 analyzed articles/videos 1,378 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Canadian Screen Awards results contain 40 faulty reasoning types, including Halo Effect , Anecdotal , and Hasty Generalization , with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 10.2% saturation with 891 hits . Analysis detected 6,892 faulty-reasoning hits from 8,706 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 2% and a BS Rank of 24% (27,052 of 35,444 keywords). This Canadian Screen Awards is better (less manipulative) than 76.30% of the peer group. Canadian Screen Awards
Keyword details
Total words: 8,706
Article count: 3
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
24% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 23.7% percentile 2.0% BS Score3 analyzed articles8.7K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 5.0% 5.0% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 1.6% 1.6% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 3.1% 3.1% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 1.0% 1.0% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 1.1% 1.1% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 4.7% 4.7% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 10.2% 10.2% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Keyword 0.8% 0.8% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias Sitewide 3.1% Keyword 0.2% 0.2% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Keyword 1.1% 1.1% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 5.0%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 11.1% Optimism Bias: Keyword 10.2%, sitewide 6.0% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 4.7%, sitewide 9.1% Halo Effect: Keyword 8.5%, sitewide 6.7% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 5.4%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 5.1%, sitewide 6.9% Anecdotal: Keyword 6.0%, sitewide 5.2% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 4.3%, sitewide 5.3% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 2.2% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 0.5% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.0% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst