Keyword summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Canada AI Strategy results contain 9 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Appeal to Authority , and Pessimism Bias , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 4.5% saturation with 395 hits . Analysis detected 1,424 faulty-reasoning hits from 8,868 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of 0% (0 of 55,265 keywords). This Canada AI Strategy is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group. Canada AI Strategy
Keyword details
Total words: 8,868
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
0% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 0.0% percentile 0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles8.9K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 2.6% 2.6% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 0.1% 0.1% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 4.5% 4.5% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 2.5% 2.5% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 0.9% 0.9% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 1.6% 1.6% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Keyword 0.3% 0.3% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Keyword 1.7% 1.7% Pessimism Bias Sitewide 1.9% Keyword 2.0% 2.0% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 4.5%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 11.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 7.5% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 4.0% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 1.9% Indoctrination: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 0.0% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst