Keyword summary
⁠23%1 analyzed article/video1,217 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Can Humans See 100 Million Colors results contain 28 faulty reasoning types, including Overconfidence Bias, Appeal to Authority, and Burden of Proof, with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 9.9% saturation with 360 hits. Analysis detected 2,622 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,651 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.6% and a BS Rank of ⁠43% (21,690 of 37,536 keywords). This Can Humans See 100 Million Colors is better (less manipulative) than 57.80% of the peer group.
Can Humans See 100 Million Colors
Keyword ranking list
Keyword details
Total words: 3,651
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

42% percentile
025507510042.2% percentile
2.6% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.7K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 2.6%2.6%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 3.9%3.9%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 1.7%1.7%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 0.8%0.8%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 0.3%0.3%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 2.4%2.4%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Keyword 9.3%9.3%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 0.9%0.9%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Keyword 1.3%1.3%Burden of ProofSitewide 0.4%Keyword 4.3%4.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 3.9%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 7.8%, sitewide 11.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 9.9%, sitewide 8.1%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 9.3%, sitewide 4.6%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 9.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 6.7%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 5.2%Burden of Proof: Keyword 4.3%, sitewide 0.4%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 4.0%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 3.8%, sitewide 1.9%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 3.6%, sitewide 0.8%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 3.3%False Dilemma: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 1.5%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 0.5%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 2.7%Appeal to Nature: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 0.2%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.2%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 1.9%Begging the Question: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 1.7%Middle Ground: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 0.1%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos