Keyword summary
0% 3 analyzed articles/videos 2,803 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Campaigns Elections results contain 43 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization , Negativity Bias , and Framing Effect , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 27.3% saturation with 2,741 hits . Analysis detected 11,572 faulty-reasoning hits from 10,036 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.7% and a BS Rank of 46% (20,616 of 37,536 keywords). This Campaigns Elections is better (less manipulative) than 54.90% of the peer group. Campaigns Elections
Keyword details
Total words: 10,036
Article count: 3
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
45% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 45.1% percentile 2.7% BS Score3 analyzed articles10K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 27.3% 27.3% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 9.4% 9.4% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 3.1% 3.1% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 10.7% 10.7% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 3.1% 3.1% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 2.5% 2.5% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 14.5% 14.5% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 0.2% 0.2% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 1.0% 1.0% Politically Right Leaning… Sitewide 1.4% Keyword 7.1% 7.1% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 27.3%, sitewide 5.3% Framing Effect: Keyword 9.4%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 10.7%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 15.9% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 14.5%, sitewide 8.1% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 9.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 7.5% Politically Right Leaning Bias: Keyword 7.1%, sitewide 1.4% In-Group Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 4.6% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 3.1% Straw Man: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 0.9% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 1.9% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 2.7% Ad Hominem: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 2.2% Recency Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 2.7% Bandwagon: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 2.2% Composition/Division: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 0.2% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst