Keyword summary
â 0% 1 analyzed article/video 1,006 analyzed words
BS Summary: These California Teachers Association results contain 30 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Appeal to Emotion , and Availability Heuristic , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 13.4% saturation with 539 hits . Analysis detected 3,460 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,024 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.9% and a BS Rank of â 50% (18,832 of 37,536 keywords). This California Teachers Association is better (less manipulative) than 50.20% of the peer group. California Teachers Association
Keyword details
Total words: 4,024
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
50% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 49.8% percentile 2.9% BS Score1 analyzed articles4K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Keyword SitewideShared scale 0â50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 13.4% 13.4% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 10.6% 10.6% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 8.7% 8.7% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 1.5% 1.5% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 4.9% 4.9% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 0.7% 0.7% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Keyword 0.8% 0.8% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 3.1% 3.1% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 2.5% 2.5% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Keyword 0.3% 0.3% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 13.4%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 10.6%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 8.7%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 4.9%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 7.8%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 6.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 5.8%, sitewide 3.3% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 3.7% Bandwagon: Keyword 3.6%, sitewide 2.2% Slippery Slope: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 1.7% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 2.5% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 1.9% Begging the Question: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 1.7% False Dilemma: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 1.5% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst