Keyword summary
76%1 analyzed article/video1,002 analyzed words
BS Summary: These California Research Grants Terminated Keywords Lawsuit results contain 28 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Negativity Bias, and Framing Effect, with Confirmation Bias as the most egregious example at 14.8% saturation with 445 hits. Analysis detected 3,020 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,006 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.6% and a BS Rank of 65% (12,710 of 35,942 keywords). This California Research Grants Terminated Keywords Lawsuit is worse (more manipulative) than 64.60% of the peer group.
California Research Grants Terminated Keywords Lawsuit
Keyword ranking list
Keyword details
Total words: 3,006
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

65% percentile
025507510064.6% percentile
3.6% BS Score1 analyzed articles3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 7.5%7.5%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 7.9%7.9%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 3.5%3.5%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 14.8%14.8%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Keyword 6.8%6.8%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 4.0%4.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 10.9%10.9%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 3.7%3.7%Begging the QuestionSitewide 1.7%Keyword 5.7%5.7%Slippery SlopeSitewide 1.7%Keyword 4.8%4.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 7.5%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 7.9%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 10.9%, sitewide 15.9%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 14.8%, sitewide 7.5%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 4.0%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 3.7%, sitewide 8.1%Unattributed Quote: Keyword 6.8%, sitewide 1.1%Halo Effect: Keyword 3.7%, sitewide 6.7%Begging the Question: Keyword 5.7%, sitewide 1.7%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Keyword 3.6%, sitewide 5.2%Slippery Slope: Keyword 4.8%, sitewide 1.7%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 3.1%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 1.9%Recency Bias: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 2.5%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.0%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 1.9%Composition/Division: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 0.2%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 0.8%Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 0.0%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos