Keyword summary
0%3 analyzed articles/videos1,686 analyzed words
BS Summary: These California Economy results contain 42 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority, Framing Effect, and Optimism Bias, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 5.8% saturation with 759 hits. Analysis detected 8,257 faulty-reasoning hits from 13,060 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.5% and a BS Rank of 9% (34,322 of 37,536 keywords). This California Economy is better (less manipulative) than 91.40% of the peer group.
California Economy
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Lieutenant Governor1%
0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
0%Texas Supreme Court1%
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
9%California Economy (selected)2%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 13,060
Article count: 3
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

9% percentile
02550751008.6% percentile
1.5% BS Score3 analyzed articles13.1K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 4.8%4.8%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 5.8%5.8%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 3.3%3.3%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 0.4%0.4%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 2.9%2.9%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 1.0%1.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 5.3%5.3%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 0.6%0.6%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 3.0%3.0%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Keyword 0.3%0.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 4.8%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 5.8%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 5.3%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 4.0%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Keyword 4.3%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 3.1%Indoctrination: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 0.0%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 2.7%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 0.5%Loss Aversion: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate