Keyword summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These California Budget results contain 37 faulty reasoning types, including Anecdotal, Negativity Bias, and Framing Effect, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 14.4% saturation with 635 hits. Analysis detected 3,352 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,404 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of ⁠0% (0 of 37,536 keywords). This California Budget is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
California Budget
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
⁠0%Lieutenant Governor1%
⁠0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
⁠0%Texas Supreme Court1%
⁠0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
⁠0%Running Back1%
⁠100%Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%Mike Lewis60%
⁠100%Joni Balter60%
⁠100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
⁠100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
⁠0%California Budget (selected)0%
Keyword details
Total words: 4,404
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

0% percentile
02550751000.0% percentile
0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles4.4K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 7.0%7.0%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 7.8%7.8%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 3.8%3.8%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 0.1%0.1%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 1.5%1.5%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 2.9%2.9%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 2.4%2.4%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 0.2%0.2%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Keyword 0.6%0.6%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Keyword 2.5%2.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 7.0%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 7.8%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 14.4%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 3.8%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 9.1%Anecdotal: Keyword 8.5%, sitewide 5.2%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 5.3%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 3.3%Begging the Question: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 1.7%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 1.9%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.2%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 2.0%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 1.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos