Keyword summary
â 0% 1 analyzed article/video 546 analyzed words
BS Summary: These California Billionaires Tax results contain 33 faulty reasoning types, including Politically Left Leaning Bias , Appeal to Emotion , and Ad Hominem , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 16.8% saturation with 367 hits . Analysis detected 3,156 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,184 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 4.4% and a BS Rank of â 75% (9,377 of 37,536 keywords). This California Billionaires Tax is worse (more manipulative) than 75.00% of the peer group. California Billionaires Tax
Keyword details
Total words: 2,184
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
75% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 75.0% percentile 4.4% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.2K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0â50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Politically Left Leaning ⌠Sitewide 2.0% Keyword 16.6% 16.6% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 6.2% 6.2% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 16.8% 16.8% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 1.9% 1.9% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 1.9% 1.9% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 1.4% 1.4% Ad Hominem Sitewide 2.2% Keyword 7.5% 7.5% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 2.2% 2.2% Bandwagon Sitewide 2.2% Keyword 7.2% 7.2% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Keyword 4.6% 4.6% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 16.8%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 6.2%, sitewide 19.2% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 16.6%, sitewide 2.0% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 16.4%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 5.4%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 7.5% Ad Hominem: Keyword 7.5%, sitewide 2.2% Bandwagon: Keyword 7.2%, sitewide 2.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 7.0%, sitewide 4.6% In-Group Bias: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 5.3%, sitewide 5.3% Indoctrination: Keyword 4.6%, sitewide 0.0% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 4.2%, sitewide 1.9% Begging the Question: Keyword 3.9%, sitewide 1.7% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 3.9%, sitewide 2.7% False Dilemma: Keyword 3.8%, sitewide 1.5% Unattributed Quote: Keyword 3.6%, sitewide 1.1% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 3.3% Red Herring: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 0.7% Loss Aversion: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 2.5% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst