Keyword summary
0%2 analyzed articles/videos547 analyzed words
BS Summary: These California Billionaire Tax results contain 26 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Appeal to Emotion, and Slippery Slope, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 15% saturation with 328 hits. Analysis detected 2,493 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,188 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 4.4% and a BS Rank of 76% (9,395 of 38,142 keywords). This California Billionaire Tax is worse (more manipulative) than 75.40% of the peer group.
California Billionaire Tax
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Wyomings Big Show1%
0%Wyoming's Big Show1%
0%Sweetwater Events Complex1%
0%Rock Springs1%
0%Ffa1%
76%California Billionaire Tax (selected)5%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 2,188
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

75% percentile
025507510075.4% percentile
4.4% BS Score2 analyzed articles2.2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 4.6%4.6%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 15.0%15.0%Slippery SlopeSitewide 1.7%Keyword 11.2%11.2%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 2.5%2.5%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 13.8%13.8%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 2.2%2.2%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 1.4%1.4%Politically Right Leaning…Sitewide 1.4%Keyword 6.3%6.3%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 2.6%2.6%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 11.5%11.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 15.0%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 4.6%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 11.5%, sitewide 15.9%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 13.8%, sitewide 5.3%Slippery Slope: Keyword 11.2%, sitewide 1.7%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 7.1%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 6.7%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 6.6%, sitewide 3.7%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Keyword 6.3%, sitewide 1.4%Optimism Bias: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 6.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 5.4%, sitewide 3.3%Anecdotal: Keyword 4.5%, sitewide 5.2%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 0.5%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 1.9%Unattributed Quote: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 1.1%Recency Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 2.7%Bandwagon: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 1.9%Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 0.0%Middle Ground: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 0.1%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 0.8%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos