Keyword summary
22% 1 analyzed article/video 731 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Caleb Ferguson results contain 19 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Biased Writer Voice , and Availability Heuristic , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 5.6% saturation with 164 hits . Analysis detected 1,142 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,924 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.1% and a BS Rank of 40% (34,516 of 56,873 keywords). This Caleb Ferguson is better (less manipulative) than 60.70% of the peer group. Caleb Ferguson
Keyword details
Total words: 2,924
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
39% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 39.3% percentile 2.1% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.9K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 5.6% 5.6% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 3.4% 3.4% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 2.9% 2.9% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 1.0% 1.0% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 3.2% 3.2% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 1.9% 1.9% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 1.7% 1.7% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 1.3% 1.3% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Keyword 1.3% 1.3% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 3.3% 3.3% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 5.6%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 5.2% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 2.7% Actor-Observer Bias: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 0.6% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 1.9% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 0.8% Hindsight Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 1.4% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst