Keyword summary
13% 1 analyzed article/video 2,734 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Cal State results contain 29 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion , Anecdotal , and Hasty Generalization , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 9.9% saturation with 808 hits . Analysis detected 2,835 faulty-reasoning hits from 8,202 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.2% and a BS Rank of 3% (34,843 of 35,715 keywords). This Cal State is better (less manipulative) than 97.60% of the peer group. Cal State
Keyword details
Total words: 8,202
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
2% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 2.4% percentile 1.2% BS Score1 analyzed articles8.2K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 0.6% 0.6% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 3.0% 3.0% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 1.1% 1.1% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 9.8% 9.8% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 1.0% 1.0% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 0.4% 0.4% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 0.5% 0.5% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 1.9% 1.9% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 1.5% 1.5% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 0.7% 0.7% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 9.8%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 5.2% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 2.5% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 2.2% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 1.9% Begging the Question: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 1.7% Primacy Effect: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 0.9% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 0.8% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst